Quote:
|
Originally Posted by ivconic
I don't "think" and i don't "beleive" - I KNOW it is charlatanism and pseudo science. I have seen hundreds of lrl devices and apparatuses in last 20 years. NONE of those ever worked in front of my eyes. NONE! NEITHER ONE! And we did numerous double blind tests, measurements, experiments.... it would need 1000 pages me to tell and explain what we done so far to establish right attitude upon this subject. This is not working (no matter which one and what method used)! Period.
|
Hundreds of LRL devices in the last 20 years that are non working is pretty strong proof. But it would take only one demonstration working in front of your eyes to redeem the name of LRLs and prove the last 20 years were not good LRLs. But there is no person on earth who is willing to show an LRL recovering treasures in front of your eyes today.
Of course, hung has given the reason why LRLs cannot find gold:
"Gold is the most powerful 'self defensive' metal when it comes to avoid any harm to its structure, such as rust, oxidation, etc. Its DNA produces a substance which coats the metal to fight against those 'threats'."
From:
http://www.geotech1.com/forums/showp...8&postcount=41
Since the substance produced by gold's DNA coats the metal and protects it against rust, oxidation, etc, trace amounts of gold ions cannot dissolve into the soil like other metals do when buried long times. Of course, this makes it impossible to form gold ions or establish an anomaly in the soil like other metals do. This suggests that perhaps hung was not making true statements when he described his LRLs detecting gold at long distances. If long time buried gold cannot shed ions to form an anomaly in the soil, then the only way hung could have detected gold is with his metal detector.
Hmmm... I wonder what this substance produced by gold's DNA is called... gold wax?
Best wishes,
J_P
"Maybe this is the debunkering"