Quote:
Originally Posted by roberts
Both of you;
just as i didnt read "492..." thread, since a most of the posts there are to anoying, same was with you - you didnt read carefully my posts.
Either you didnt cared to read and understand my posts, either i didnt sayed it on proper way. It is to anoying now, me to list all the pages and look for some sentences. Also it is anoying me to explain here about "electrical" and material lenght of an antenna. Why should i explain here this? What should be my motif?? Whatever i do, jokes like esteban will always come here to negate my claims without proper reading at all and without elementar understanding of anything i could say here. I suggested to some people to return to learn basics, didnt i?
So if you want to accept my hint - fine. If you dont - fine also.
With that gap..how you just explained...nothing will be adjusted - NOTHING.
Totall nonsence! Frequency...????? WHAT A NONSENCE !?!?!?
Only ignorants like esteban can come here a say such huge nonsence!!!
|
Robert,you are again going back to your bad habits.
Just forget Esteban post if you are smart enought, you both are just doing that from the beginning.This is not constructive.You should be both used to it by now
About the ferrite stuff,
no i didnt understand why you talked about thouthands of meters of wire,anyway it is not so important, as i posted there i already know an antena can be buit for any frequency with any size.
(You should be abe to accept critics, this is a signal of intelligence
)
And coming back to our circuit , yes if you change gap you will slightly change permeability and consequently frequency of oscillation.
Now, if by doing this you can achieve a good nulling i am not sure .YOU should be able to tell.
Hope you will keep going with the circuit interpretation.
Regards,
Fred.