[hung]

The way I was measuring the variances, was opening the examiner box and placing the positive probe in the lead of the diode which is connected to the pot. This however proved awkward to perform, specially because I had the top lid with the calculator falling to the sides risking to break the tiny wires soldered inside the circuit and also for dificulty of maneuvering for a photo session.
RT claimed to have measured the voltages without the need of opening the box. Simply connecting the positive lead to the handle and the negative to the antenna tip would suffice. I checked that and confirmed no perceivable differences existed, so I decided to use this aproach for this intent.

The initial series of pics show my wife holding the examiner. On pic#1, probes unconected and multimeter display with minimum activity, in this case, 0.000mv.
Pic#2, with calculator display on zero. Notice the low value reading on the multimeter. In fact as the 4 digit multimeter is very sensitive, it keeps changing values all the time. This makes it hard to document it in pictures, as I would have to use a very fast camera to shoot all these peak variations which would be completely unpractical. So I chose to shoot peaks according to parameters. So on 3, with calculator on gold’s frequency, notice the relative voltage rise. The display kept changing with up variations peaking at 8 (shown) with average on 5 to 6. No contact from her hand to any probe lead.