Quote:
Or have you decided to partecipate and win the Carl's LRL Challenge ??? 
(to demonstrate that your commercial-LRLs work )
|
That question is so ridiculous, and is asked over & over again to promote Carl's agenda of riducule and untruths.
My answer is still the same. NO! NO! NO!
My products cannot do as you or Carl, seem to expect of them, and cannot pass Carl's, stupid Gimmick Challenge test.
You are playing the same old Skeptic Org. broken record.
I was informed with Randi, standing right beside me, that I only got 6 of the 8 tests he conducted correct. That is considered no better than chance guessing. Randi, said, more testing would have to be done before any conclusions could be reached.
I agree, and I have done years of Field testing with the present LRL configurations . I know the limitations, and have experienced the benefits.
Carl's challenge has no Scientific merit, and is meaningless when it is designed to be un-winnable by LRL except by rare chance luck. It is a sham, a publicity gimmick and you fall hook line & sinker for it, I know better. So, you can give up his bark up my tail and try to learn what real Science investigation is about from JP's example.
Don't critize me, or my products. I do not lie, and The do as I claim they do. Just prove that you can build something less expensive, that works better than I am presently using and I will buy from you.
Promoting Carl's, Skeptic mockery of others to cover up your own ignorance is a poor excuse for being closed minded to reality and the truth. Dell