Thanks! I'm trying to ascertain if we are studying the same energy fields? There appear to be striking similarities with reference to Mineoro's description, but there are wide descrepancies between some parts of our studies and analysis.
The "fields" I am familiar with do not necessarily rise vertical from the target to the surface. In earlier years, they were mostly vertical with an occasional offset of 1-9 degrees to the South. The residual effects of years of a double Solar cycle, the slowing of the earth's spinning core, and the migration of the earths polarity, appear to have changed that. There is no longer any predicability as to whether the target "Field" will be rising vertical, at an angle, or the degree of angle.
I have electronicly metered these "Fields" to an altitude above the ground surface of 2,000 feet from an aircraft with a Frequency Discriminator, located the anomalies on the ground, and ground truthed at least one of the anomalies.
Using another electronic method referred to as a "Gamma Scan" for the lack of a better name, we have conducted Treasure survey's using an aircraft and later ground truthed the locations, that were detected from altitudes up to 6,000 feet, and 150 miles distance. The Denver, Co mint was used as a reference point in learning to calibrate the instrument from the air, at distances up to 350 miles.
There is more, but the interesting thing is, the target signals from these high tech electronic instruments can be metered with simple L-Rod(s). We are easily able to did this with the Mineoro.
It will be interesting for me to learn if the New Mineoro, has the broadcast strength to over come the conditions that hindered our use of the model tested in Central Florida, and appears to me to be a problem in other parts of the USA as well, before I would consider, or reccommend it's purchase at this time.
Knowing what I know about the field use of LRL, I am skeptical of the New Mineoro models ability to perform consistently under our present operating conditions. I hope I can look forward to being proved wrong. Dell
|