[hung]

Originally Posted by Dell Winders

I'm open minded about the things which I know have already been done. I allow myself to be skeptical of things that don't seem likely within my own realm of understanding.

I called the Mineoro owner, to confirm the hours the specific hours the Mineoro was not supposed to work, but he didn't have access to his operator's manual, but 11 to 1 sounded close.

I checked the Mineoro web site for the on-line instructions and they were no longer there. Sorry, I can't say for sure.

I was reading reading the information about their "Substance Classifier" and was suddenly stunned at the realization the description of reasons and effects were describing in detail the effects of my own product "X-SCAN" which I never considered to be working according to an Ion theory.

Even with many years of using LRL and Frequency Discrimination, I am as amazed and elated with the abilities of the X-SCAN, as the inventors of Mineoro, appear with their New invention. I really don't know how it works, but if as you say, that Mineoro, would sue OKM for infringement, it certainly raises reason for my concern.

If it took Mineoro 50 years to build their New Invention from their theory, and it took me 3 weeks to build my New invention from my own simplistic theory. That means they were there first and mine, is still developing. I haven't taken the time to convert it into a beeper yet.

But, that's what I like about competition. It forces manufacturers to build better products for lower prices, and that benefits consumers.

Iam happy to see Mineoro, is stopping their continous upgrade policy and passing the costs on to the consumer each time. My thanks, for becoming a new example for my Skeptic Cult logo. "WHAT HAS BEEN DONE, CAN BE DONE" Dell

Dell,
Understand the Mineoro's method of 'classify' the substances.

http://www.mineoro.com/treasure/diference.htm