"yes I need learn more because, as you said, I watch in the mirror and only see a donkey!"
It was just retorics. I do not consider anybody here as a donkey, esspecially not you Esteban!
And i don't want to wake up one morning and see a donkey in a mirror.That was on my mind.
"As I see, there are persons that "Robert" who know all of alls. He don't need infos, nothing.
He automatically dissapoint and ready!"
I would be very happy if do know "all of alls", like you claimed, but, of course there is no
such man yet,on this world. I do need infos, but much infos here are very obsolete and exceeded.
Some of present infos are barefaced lies, made by very ignorant persons, in manner to fulfill
some sick interest, nothing else.That kind of infos i do not need.
I never saw any schematic with tecnical notes here,that's bugs me most.If you look other forums
you'll see a much schematics with very competent notes,hints and tips from very conversant
people.I always check those in my lab, and it is very easy to establish some attitude on
that project and person who posted it.Here i see only "mega" claims and a lot of retorics.
If you are so sure in LRL stuff, why don't any of you post here any project, for others to
try,check and see? For example, Lostfox posted electronic dowsing rod project, with 567 i.c.
so everybody could make it and simply test it. Of course, later turns to be a nonsence toy, but
still Lostfox is worth of my respect, he made some effort, he didn't post stupid claims and
empty retorics. Can't you see Esteban, what is my point? All of you people here are just
talking,talking,claiming....How can anybody check all those? One more thing...You posted here
some link on modification on Kamil Craus project with 565 ic.I made that toy 10 years ago. It is
a sort of BFO.Totally unusable.You don't expect me to consider you as a serious man with posts
like this!? If you are still dealing with toys than what to say more!?
Hung almost compare it...:
"I really doubt this goes deeper than my Minelab Excalibur....."
Ha,ha,ha !!! Hung,man,are you a jokin!? Your Minelab Excalibur is a hell of a detector.Do not
compare it with toys please! I do consider MInelab detectors the very best of! The state of art
in detectors world! My best experiences are with Minelab detectors.
So,Esteban,Hung...man...reading some posts here, sometimes i am very confused about how to
evaluate your knowledge and how serioslly to judge your posts and you as a persons?
"Robert: wich is your experiences in long distance detectors? You, as engineer in
telecommunications, had builded a device based on radio? If not, what you are waiting? Do you
know that radio is good for to find good conductive metals? Maybe not, because in the university
don't teach you and others about how to find treasure with radio. And why the professors
don't teach about it? Simple: they don't experiment in this way! Better: don't know!"
Very rich, trust me. That's why i made such claims. Over the 15 years i do build a various
devices based on radio. I work as a professional for over 15 years. I made up to 300 radio
tx's, trancievers, handy's, amp's etc.etc. I am also radio amateur.Work on 80m,11m,2m,70cm...
I do have full lab with devices.What to say? Radio is NOT GOOD for finding any metals!
Radio frequencies from 150 kHz up to 2GHz(i been worked with) are NOT PENETRATING IN any
type of ground or through! Nobody here can convince me in a such stupid nonsence ever!
You are confusing so much terms and principles here.It is very hard for me to talk with you
cose you don't know what are you talking about!I do mean this from the deep of my heart I do
not want to insult you at all.This is not my intention at all.Not to undervalue you or your
intelect too.Just to tell you that you are confusing everything.Schools and university's are not
just for fun. You have to learn many more things to became conversant to talk about some things.
You are undervalued all that by your last calim.Try to post some like this to some science forum
or to some university, MIT for example.You'll get no answer or a big laugh from them.
"I, via my ignorance -but experimenting- achieve more than others"
O.K. i am ready to accept this if you post here some tech, not just retorics.Show here your
experiments, your projects, schematics, datas and i test it and later post you my oppinion.
Even i am ready to help you to solve some problems or to improve your work.Just look some
other thread here...
"The persistence in some ideas and work in it, this is the unique way of the knowledge!"
If do without elementar knowledge almost always ends with head trough wall!
"As maybe I don't know much about your profession -and as I don't know much, only a few-
I don't attack you in your work"
Thank you very much for that.It would lead us to nowhere too. I do not attack your work too.
I attack just empty claims without any tech background.
"Please, don't attack us (Detectoman, Dell, Hung, Michael, I and others)shooting in any
direction, but with poor results in your objective."
I started attacking mineoro not you people! But some of you became strong mineoro defenders
that's why faced with me and me with you. You found yourself "called" with no reason at all.
Later it turned into dirty argue and "war". I didn't want that at the begining.
To go with this further does not make any sence to me.But if you apply here some schematics
and projects on LRL than we can talk some constructive talk more.
You are claiming something about radio and RF. For a start come and post some about it.
Or shut up forever.
P.S.
another look on device which cost several hundreds of $ !!!
Come again and claim some claims here! This device worth nothing and do nothing.So how can
i respect any more of claims here? WHo i am dealing with here!?
P.S. II
AGAIN !???
agin anoying nonsence pictures that shows nothing!?
Is that all you can post here!?