@ Nicolas
Of course this is still cooperation, Nicolas, for technical interested people like you -
otherwise I wouldn't write here at all.
But it is also punishment and huge critizism to all who wanna play false games here
and rob innocent naive people precious ressources, be it money, time or whatever.
Instead of writing here I could enjoy my life but I wanna show some engagement -
this is also for the benefit of the treasure-hunting community itself which can't
afford to waste his hard earned money for "illusional things".
And I wanna support Carls basic intention who brought already enough light into
sinister LRL-pandora boxes - for our all sake, don't forget this.
@ Nelson
It is sad that you are so deep into your LRL thing that you won't accept the opinions
of others anymore. Is it so hard to understand that the public wants something
reasonable, working and technical understandable instead any "mystical tales"?
Your comment was just a proof of ignorance. Someone also can't discuss with fanatic believers
of some sort of "religions" - in fact many just consisting of 1000 year old fairy-tales, too.
@ Dell Winders
You may be a really good person seen from the heart with honest intentions and a true
will for working technical things out but seems something goes wrong big time - I have no idea what.
So please try to explain to us where do you see the difference in your work compared
to Garrett or other "real working MD producers"?
Now you have the "solar-wind"-excuse and before you may had others.
Please Dell, ask yourself:
Until what point you can provide any serious proof? Does your detector(s) find something
at least from 1meter under provable conditions? And what arguments do you have if you
have to explain that it will work under good conditions at much better distance?
What I wanna say to you and to all:
@ all
Give us a starting point! A STARTING POINT, like where you start a race!
If you LRL-convinced people don't even have such a "minimal requirements needed detection
possibility" how you can assume we would accept your stories of much larger distances?!
If I can't move a wheel which is fixed on some axes not just 1mm because everything
is completly rusted how should I assume it will be able turning around like hell?
And by the way - just as a warning to everyone here:
If people wanna rip off others there are 2 very simple choices:
1) Declaring sh*t as gold
2) "receiving" (better: exploiting) actual ressources for a so called better future!
Paying church-taxes per instance: Work now hard and give the earned money away for a
paradisic afterlife!
Or pumping up usual ground-water and declare it as luxury mineral water!
...too bad, you have been tricked... but as a rich millionaire you have enough cash anyway...
Similar methods too many wanna-be scoundrels apply to sell their LRLs:
"Pay thousands of bucks NOW for this super real working detector and earn LATER the
huge treasures with it!"
Yeah, absolutly for shure.... Who wants to be the victim?
Before one single LRL should get the permission for being sold the user should have
2 weeks of "try before you buy" and if he is not happy with it, no matter why,
the full money must given back! This is the only method to stop all those dirty
developments in the LRL scene once and for all.
Nobody needs a stove pipe where only the owner itself can see through it the moon
like with a huge telescope!
Can't you understand this, dear LRL convinced?
Is this too much for you?
Do you know the fairy-tale:
The Emperor's New Clothes
(Hans Christian Andersen)
http://www.maerchen.net/classic/a-k_kleider.htm
eng translated link:
http://translate.google.com/translat...-k_kleider.htm
Where only the weavers and the betrayed emperor could see the shiny fantastic clothes?
Read it, its a perfect analogy to the nonsens that we are facing here since many years!
And the most guilty culprit of course are persons like hung who pretend to sit directly
on the source of "special information" and provide nothing than bullsh*t here.
@ All you others LRL convinced electronical interested persons
Don't you understand that for shure it will be very hard for anyone to believe what
you wanna tell us if even already the "main LRL specialists" like hung create such a mess?
I ask again:
Where is your real provable starting point?
Where are your LRL-basics?
Something ultra-simple like the lamp circuit (inbetween of a battery).
Or described even better:
Where do you think is your fundament if it comes to real working LRL-circuits ?? ? ? ?? ?
By Alonso? By hung? At South-America somewhere deep in the jungle?
by the way: All those rain-forest destroyers there should face a second bloody
conquistadores invasion - would be the best solution to them....
What makes you better than those mentioned "LRL experts" who told already nothing
than "invincible clothes stories" here?!
If you are working serious and scientific and even if you got just basic but real provable
results everything is fine.
And how can you think that Alonso himself couldn't improve his own 20 years old circuit
much better (or has tried it already) than all you guy now wanna do?
See it simple: Something that doesn't work can't get improved!
So better focus your eyes on something real useful.
If you remain fixed to this infamous Alonso circuit (because it costed already enough people
a fortune!
) all you do is like trying to create 1 meter sparks with a piezo-lighter - it also can't work!
(ok, maybe it works with a huge additional coil, but you wouldn't see the ultra-thin flash anymore)
Where is your small but at least really working technological LRL starting point ?!
I ask it again and again... ask it yourself, if you can...
This is the minimum we have to know.