Quote:
Originally Posted by humhum
Maybe Sakis1 say this theory :
|
Hi humhum,
I do not think this is the theory that sakis1 says his PD can locate long distance with.
What this image shows is how to solve a sparking problem when you make MRI images to study how cell phone batteries perform.
It has nothing to do with remote locating.
The image you posted is from Argonne National Laboratory, which shows how they solved the problem of sparking that can destroy the NMR coil and the sample inside it when a laboratory tries to make an MRI image of a battery cell.
This image shows a high strength magnetic field solenoid with a small battery placed inside it that has a problem of sparking at the coil which destroys the coil and the battery.
Their solution is to position the battery being tested in a sealed metal disk-shaped container with a second circular metal sensor disk at the opposite end of the apparatus.
This testing is done to determine the cyclic insertion and extraction of lithium in a carbon mixture that is currently used in commercially available lithium-ion batteries by 7Li NMR spectroscopy under actual operating conditions.
We see how sakis1 said his modification can be explained by looking at the google images for NMR and MRI.
But all of the NMR and MRI images I see require a strong magnetic field that cannot be produced by the 9v batteries we see in a portable pistol locator.
NMR and MRI detectors require very high magnetic fields that are not found from common magnets.
This makes me think that the modification sakis1 made is not working from NMR principles.
I think his modification is working from a different principle than MRI or NMR.
Maybe sakis1 can show us more about his modifications so we can see some details to know what he did to change from the original metal locator that I posted above.
Best wishes,
J_P