Quote:
Originally Posted by Rudy
Hi JP,
Thanks, I think you said what I was trying to say much better. The implication is that a person standing in the field holding an electric field meter of some kind, is dramatically distorting the field the meter is reading and the distortion moves with the man/meter apparatus wherever they go. Hmm.
BTW: I had the pleasure of meeting Dr. Feynman back in the late sixties when he paid a visit to the company I was then working at. I was most impressed with his wit and demeanor.
|
Ya he taught classes in Pasadena about real science, not a bunch of made up stuff that seemed like it might be true.
About the electric field meter... some LRL enthusiasts such as Esteban say it is important to wear cotton clothing when using an LRL that works by sensing faint electric fields. This is so as not to develop a charge which could be seen as noise to a sensitive meter. Also, the typical LRL is held out in front of you hopefully at the periphery of whatever you are doing to the field. The presumption is the meter is looking through a fairly constant window of a gradient (your body gradient) to the distant charge anomalies that they try to detect. As long as your body charge gradient is not varying, it should not skew the reading, but simply raise the noise floor a little. We know a zahori detects something because it picks up electric power transmission lines from a very large distance. In the best of conditions, maybe it can detect nearby anomalies in the space charge. What I keep thinking is the influence of variations in the ground water will have a larger influence on the charge anomalies than traces of treasure ionization in the soil. This is why I think it is more suited to finding water.
Best wishes,
J_P