[J_Player]

Originally Posted by Mike(Mont)

I'm certainly not here to defend H3TEC. I think their prices are obscene. I have never used one so I don't know. Anyone here tried one? Didn't think so but that never stopped anyone from claiming they kknow all about it. I know someone who bought one and they didn't have much good to say about it, but I don't know if they are skilled enough to use one. I also heard second hand that another person who owns one likes it.

I've said I doubt many of these people who own one really know how to use it. Like the guy in the NatGeo show, I question his skill. A person gets a map and guess what? They are dead-set on the rod pulling to that spot on the map. That's the get-rich-quick fever I preach against. That's the same manic depression syndrome that all the skeptics cannot overcome. So they blame the LRL when it is really their own fault. That's what I mean when I talk about ego problems. Add to that a person who makes their living in the metal detector business and you definitely have a recipe for disaster.

Blame?
Whose fault is it when an H3Tec fails to find the metal it is claimed to find?
How can anyone know anything about H3Tec who did not try one?

Everyone who I read about trying an H3Tec locator said they don't work except people associated with the manufacturer.
But what else can we learn without actually trying an H3Tec without trying it?
A lot.

1. The internal circuitry is fake.
It has a circuit board and a proprietary program to locate metals. But the front end and sensors for this circuit are bogus dowsing rods that are not connected in a manner that could deliver a signal.
See here and read downward: http://www.geotech1.com/forums/showt...972#post119972
The dowsing rod which is claimed to send out a signal to excite the isotope that is selected is connected to a ground wire, not to a signal wire.
Also read the patent. The claims are not the same as what the H3Tec factory propaganda says it does.
It appears that H3Tec lied to us about this isotope signal stuff.

2. When the H3Tec people were searching for silver during their demonstration, they were not able to detect Carl's 10 oz silver bar he had in his pocket when he walked in front of them.
Nor were they able to locate the silver coins that Tim Williams hid for them to find.
The owner of H3Tec told us a lie to explain why the locator failed to detect Carl's bar of silver.
He said it was set for a different isotope of silver that is found in coins... not in a silver bar.
See here: http://www.geotech1.com/forums/showt...7892#post87892
And here: http://www.geotech1.com/forums/showt...7935#post87935
Ask any physicist about this. It is either a lie or the owner of H3Tec has no clue about the physics of silver and its isotopes.

3. H3Tec lied when they posted this picture on their website to depict the US military training when they stated "H3 Tec is in the army and on the ground protecting our troops in the Middle East".
They also posted information saying "The US Army ordered new and improved H3 for the army in the war theater".
These are both lies but they are still posted on the H3Tec main page.



Read about it here: http://forum.treasurenet.com/index.php?topic=375415.0

4. H3Tec lied when they represented their locator as having won the Utah Innovation Award.
The attorney for the presenter of this award confirmed they did not win this award. See here: http://www.geotech1.com/forums/showt...609#post124609

5. H3Tec lied when they said their detector had to pass double blind tests at for their claims certifications Chemir Labs.
Chemir Labs says they do not perform double blind tests. See here: http://www.geotech1.com/forums/showthread.php?p=119622

6. If you watch the National Geographic's "Secret History of Gold" video, you will see that what they printed about their detector locating the gold is also a lie.

So far I listed six provable lies H3Tec told to try to fool people into thinking their locator is highly respected and actually detects things.
We also have seen the wiring inside the locator which proves they lied about sending out a signal which excites the isotope of the substance you are looking for in a grid up to 10 miles square.

This is what we can learn about H3Tec without trying it out. And for $10,000 each plus annual software fees, I would rather conclude they told a pack of lies to promote their fake detector.
Maybe I would believe them if they really did a double blind test instead of lying about doing a double blind test.
Or maybe if they were able to find the coins that Tim Williams hid for them.
Or maybe if they really found the gold that they lied about finding in the National Geographic video.

Maybe this is a good piece of equipment for people who like to spend large sums of money to associate with liars.

Best wishes,
J_P