Well, Thank You.... you finally (inadvertantly) answered my question. I'm sure you didn't mean to, but you did.
Graham said;
".....just as it is impossible to prove there are no signal lines"
That's the answer I've been looking for all along, which proves No Matter what evidence I place here proving that signal lines do not exist - YOU (in your infinite wisdom
) would not accept it, and WOULD NOT change your mind about signal lines. Wonderful!
Consequently, me going to the trouble of placing my test results and evidence here would be a huge waste of my time.
Thanks again for finally answering my question, even though you didn't mean to.
If this latest little "dance routine" of yours is any indication of how difficult it is to communicate with you; I can certainly see why you are not following through with the testing of the Examiner. Have you ever made a decision in your entire life, and then followed through with it? Apparently not.
