Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Theseus
I must admit Graham, I can't figure out if you are really as dense as you portray yourself to be; or perhaps it's just an act.
I don't know how much clearer I can be. You seem to be hung up on how I "format" my test data and protocol definition, and what I include in my details.
...format the data in any type or content you want provided Carl-NC can read it and identify it as a scientific test you ran that proves signal lines are imaginary.
...describe the protocol and any controls you used for the tests.
...include the test result data you observed.
...include any additional information that you consider pertinent.
Now, for the very last time, Graham... it is not how I format the information, or how I describe it, or what I include in it; that I am concerned about. Trust me, I have been conducting tests, reducing data, drawing conclusions and putting my results in very readable report formats since before you found out the ASA rating of Panatomic X could be doubled with the proper mix of D-76, time and temperature adjustments...  |
Wrong again!
I was never hung up on what format you used. You are the one who posted you wanted to know how to format your data.
Scroll up and read your words:
" ....just let me know, so I format my data accordingly". If you didn't want to know how to format your data, then why did you post that?
And why attempt to blame me for answering?
This wouldn't be another trick to direct attention away from the fact you have no evidence of testing signal lines to present, would it?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Theseus
My ONLY concern is what you would accept as valid and would cause you to believe "signal lines" do not exist in the real world.
|
Also scroll up and see the answer several times. I will accept any test you made in any format with any data types that will convince Carl-NC that you conducted a scientific test that proves signal lines are imaginary. Take note: "any test you made" is what I would accept as valid. The only condition is that Carl is convinced.
There it is verbalized in words again.
Are you still afraid Carl-NC won't be convinced you conducted a test that proves signal lines are imaginary?
You realize of course, if Carl is not convinced, I probably won't be either.
But then you have nothing to lose.
After seeing what you posted so far instead of supporting evidence, it looks like you never ran any tests that prove signal lines are imaginary.
It seems to me you just made it all up.
Hmmmm... maybe you made up the stories about testing LRLs too.
Best wishes,
J_P