I must admit Graham, I can't figure out if you are really as dense as you portray yourself to be; or perhaps it's just an act.
I don't know how much clearer I can be. You seem to be hung up on how I
"format" my test data and protocol definition, and what I include in my details.
...format the data in any type or content you want provided Carl-NC can read it and identify it as a scientific test you ran that proves signal lines are imaginary.
...describe the protocol and any controls you used for the tests.
...include the test result data you observed.
...include any additional information that you consider pertinent.
Now,
for the very last time, Graham... it is not how I
format the information, or how I
describe it, or what I
include in it; that I am concerned about. Trust me, I have been conducting tests, reducing data, drawing conclusions and putting my results in very readable report formats since before you found out the ASA rating of Panatomic X could be doubled with the proper mix of D-76, time and temperature adjustments.
My ONLY concern is what
you would accept as valid and would cause you to believe "signal lines" do not exist in the real world.
If you can't or don't wish to verbalize that kind of information; just say so. I sense the readership is tiring of this "back and forth".... and I am too.
BTW, if this thread, Rangertell Examiner Field Trials, is in your mind closed because you have decided not to test the Examiner, might I suggest you request an Admin to close and lock the thread.