[Theseus]

Nice duck and dodge, Graham.

1. You can format the data.....
2. Your test report should describe.....
3. Your test report should include.....
4. You may (at your option) include any.....

Contrary to you, I have been designing, conducting and overseeing experimental test procedures (specifically electronic instrumentation) for probably longer than you have been on this planet. Your points above (1 thru 4) are the most elementary, and obvious, that even the most novice engineers and test technicians are aware of as basic requirements. (There are several others you've not included, but I'm assuming that's because you are covering ground that is totally foreign to you.)

Iterating the obvious, as a smoke screen to avoid what I asked for, may fool some here; but it does not satisfy my original request.

Further, I am very aware that; "Any test that the owner of this forum would describe as a scientific test that proves signal lines are imaginary is satisfactory."


Now, what I need from you is for you to verbalize the actual explanation you would accept as valid and would cause you to believe "signal lines" do not exist in the real world.

Once I see that; we can quit playing your circular delay tactic game, I can evaluate if my test protocol and results will be accepted by you and will be worth my time and effort to transcribe it to this forum. Alternatively, if I determine my test results are not something that will "cause you to believe" - than I'm not wasting my time putting it up here.

BTW, why do you keep ignoring my question about the current status of the RangerTell Examiner Field Trials?