[J_Player]

Originally Posted by Theseus

I can repeat that request just as many times as you want...

Sure you can repeat your request. You can also continue to pretend I didn't answer it. But what you can't do is describe the alleged testing you claimed to do.
As a reminder, here is the answer:

Originally Posted by J_Player

Any test that the owner of this forum would describe as a scientific test that proves signal lines are imaginary is satisfactory. As far as presentation, the protocol should be described, along with any controls that were used, a list of the data observed in the test results, and any other pertinent information you want to include. In short, any test report that would convince Carl-NC that you ran a test that proves signal lines are imaginary.

So far, my predictions are correct:

Originally Posted by J_Player

Here is my prediction:
You will not tell any details of your alleged testing to determine signal lines are imaginary.
Instead you will produce excuses, and raise hurdles that others must first pass before you will consider describing the details of your tests.
In the end you will never show test details.
Yet you will attempt to maintain you have conducted tests while failing to show any real evidence you conducted tests.

Best wishes,
J_P