View Single Post
  #709  
Old 10-05-2010, 10:51 AM
J_Player's Avatar
J_Player J_Player is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: California
Posts: 4,382
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Qiaozhi
This is why the burden of proof is on the claimant. Otherwise you could keep scanning Earth's orbit for the tea tray, only to be told, "Keep searching, it's definitely there. You're just not looking in the right place".
I agree. This is a basic principle that is used in the legal system of every civilized country. In this case we see someone coming around boasting about how he made tests that show proof, yet is not able to describe what kind of tests for the reason "it takes too much time". When he learned it is not necessary to retrieve documents and scan them, but to simply describe the test, we heard a new reason why he no longer had the burden to prove his claim that he conducted tests: He is afraid his tests would not be convincing to skeptics! (You recall I answered him "In short, any test report that would convince Carl-NC that you ran a test that proves signal lines are imaginary" is satisfactory). So he is afraid his testing would not convince Carl-NC he conducted a test that proves signal lines are imaginary?

This sounds similar to an excuse an LRL promoter uses to typically avoid proving he conducted tests to demonstrate his scientific discoveries. We are expected to believe his alleged tests took place and therefore he also has the scientific discoveries which he keeps secret for his own use. So we must believe that he is the only person who has actually tested and proved these discoveries, without providing any details or proof that he made these tests. His latest excuse was "I have absolutely no interest whasoever in discussing it or convincing anyone about it. But even if I did have... no, I beleive I would not be able to convince you or some skeptics here and I doubt it that I would ever be".

Now Theseus has copied this exact same excuse used by the LRL promoter to evade showing that he actually did testing on signal lines and arrived at a determination, when it seems obvious he did not. He brags about how he made tests to determine that signal lines are imaginary, yet cannot even describe these tests. The issue is not whether the test results were convincing. It is whether any tests were done at all!

What makes more sense?
Does Theseus also have a secret bunker where he and his team perform tests that are so secret they cannot be talked about?
Or did he simply make up the story of conducting tests of signal lines?

Best wishes,
J_P
Reply With Quote