I don't want to enter into this "discussion" ... but only to say that the burden of proof is on the person(s) who are claiming that signal lines exist, not on everyone else to disprove it. Someone waving a couple of sticks around in the air, and stating that they can feel the force, does not constitute proof.
Some time ago I used an analogy where I stated that there was a tea tray in orbit around the Earth, and challenged others to disprove it. If that sounds silly ... well, it is! But the same concept applies to signal lines. The most you could ever hope to prove is that someone claiming they can feel the signal line should be tested using doubled-blind methods. Even if the (inevitable) result shows that the person being tested cannot detect the lines, it does not prove their non-existence. It only proves that they were not detected.
This is why the burden of proof is on the claimant. Otherwise you could keep scanning Earth's orbit for the tea tray, only to be told, "Keep searching, it's definitely there. You're just not looking in the right place".
|