Quote:
Originally Posted by Theseus
"Can you describe the type and content of the data you would accept (from outside sources you did not observe) as valid and would cause you to believe "signal lines" do not exist in the real world?"
Graham, when you get through with your ducking and dodging routine, I'll still be waiting for your answer.
There is no way I will waste a lot of valuable time placing a target up here, to then have you merely argue that it is worthless and unacceptable as proof "signal lines" do not exist. Do you think I was born yesterday and can't see through your little dance routine? (rhetorical)
Throw up all the straw men you want; but when you get tired, just remember the question above still needs an answer from you.
Speaking of delay tactics; what progress are you making towards completing the Examiner field trials?  |
I already told you twice the answer. Scroll up and read it.
It is here:
http://www.geotech1.com/forums/showp...&postcount=692
and here:
http://www.geotech1.com/forums/showp...&postcount=705
I answered your question yesterday and repeated them today.
Still you consider you have no burden of proof?
Guess again!
They were your own words:
"Try to remember, the burden of proof is on those making the claims..."
And it was also you who made the claim:
"I conducted several tests, back in the 80s, to determine that "signal lines" were an imaginary entity"
So what happened to your burden of proof?
Would you like to modify your statement to say A) "The burden of proof is on those people other than me making the claims"?
Or maybe you want to modify your statement to say B) "I never made any tests in 1988 or any other time on signal lines, and this is the reason I cannot tell any details of a test I never did"
Have you chosen option-A to avoid being discovered as a fraud if you choose option B?
Or is there another reason?
Is it possible that you actually did perform some sort of test, but are afraid to tell any details of it because some readers may recognize the test incident and discover a secret identity which you don't wish to reveal?
Nah, I don't think that is likely. Everyone knows you, they love you, they can't live without you. The most probable scenario in my opinion is you didn't perform any tests on signal lines.
You already had my answers for two days now. Any weird ideas that your burden of proof is contingent on what I think, say or do is mistaken. Only the test evidence has any importance in determining proof, not peoples opinion about a test. But you knew that because you read what Carl had to say about it. You are just wasting time making excuses for what? So you don't have to admit you never did a test?
Did you?
Prove it.
Best wishes,
J_P