Quote:
Originally Posted by J_Player
Sure. Any test that the owner of this forum would describe as a scientific test that proves signal lines are imaginary is satisfactory. As far as presentation, the protocol should be described, along with any controls that were used, a list of the data observed in the test results, and any other pertinent information you want to include. In short, any test report that would convince Carl-NC that you ran a test that proves signal lines are imaginary.
But to satisfy me, it is easier. I will concede that you actually ran tests if you simply post the information, regardless of whether Carl-NC accepts it as scientific proof. My argument is you did not show evidence of testing, so if you show the details as described above, I would be happy to admit I was wrong.
Best wishes,
J_P
|
Heh, heh.....
another "straw man" you've knocked down. Do you think I was born yesterday (rhetorical).
The question I asked you was NOT what I could post that would prove I ran the tests. I specifically asked;
"Can you describe the type and content of the data you would accept (from outside sources you did not observe) as valid and would cause you to believe "signal lines" do not exist in the real world?"
Quite obviously you didn't like that question; but in putting up your "straw man" you gave me my answer anyway. Thank you.
