Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Theseus
Not sure how many times I need to repeat this.
It's not that I don't have the data, it's located in a collection of notes, yellow-grid engineering paper and small spiral notebooks. I simply do not have the desire or the time to dig into the source, rent time on a scanner and try to place it on a public forum. Not to mention the fact; I already know ahead of time, you would not be satisfied by it anyway since it is my data and you did not observe it being recorded.
I guess you'll just have to believe my data on faith. After all, if you are a theist, you believe and accept your beliefs on blind faith - so I guess that's what you'll have to do here, in regards to my test results and conclusions.
 |
I never asked for scans of yellow grid paper and spiral notebooks. I only asked to see the evidence that you actually performed testing. Specifically, to tell us:
How scientific was your test?
What did you use for a control?
Let's see a detailed report that shows your proof so we can also read the data to determine whether signal lines are an imaginary entity or not.
No scanning is necessary, simply tell us how the test was conducted, what protocol, what controls, and the data from the results. Just type in the answers so we can see how your test proved that signal lines are imaginary. Then we can all know for sure instead of relying on hearsay and logical arguments that had no testing to support it. If this was a scientific test, then we skeptics will finally have indisputable proof when we tell people signal lines don't exist. It does not need to satisfy me, as long as the proof is there. Any skeptic will easily accept your scientific test that proves signal lines are imaginary. Some LRL enthusiasts may change their views on "signal lines" after reading tour test report, and a lot of undecided treasure hunters could become convinced. And I will be happy to admit I was wrong to think you did not conduct any test.
My guess is you cannot tell us what protocol, controls and data because there was no protocol, controls, data, or test made at all. The brings to mind the time when hung insisted he made tests to find a signal from the Rangertell calculator, but after Carl-NC pointed out it is obvious he did not, he quickly got a cheap voltmeter and took some measurements so people wouldn't think he just made up the story of how he actually ran tests.
If you really did make tests that proved the signal line is imaginary, then I am surprised you never published the results to support your argument. This is the only information that can validate your claims that you ran tests. Yet you are still making excuses why you cannot disclose the details of this test. Shall we presume you never conducted this test, or do you actually have details you could describe?
Best wishes,
J_P