Quote:
Originally Posted by Theseus
Sooooo.... you do believe in Santa Claus and the The Tooth Fairy.  (I'm not surprised)
Do you also work for Hung and R-T on a commission basis?
Might I remind you; some of the truth in this world is self-evident and really doesn't require buying test equipment and rearranging your busy schedule to test for it.
 |
If you recall, I said nothing about Santa Clause or tooth fairies. Those are claims you did not succeed in putting in my post.
If you are capable of reading what was claimed, you can see your inquisition was on the topic of "signal lines" for which I said "I don't know" if they are being radiated or returned because I don't have the correct equipment to measure them.
However, you said you did test them and arrived at a determination to make a definite statement of fact about signal lines:
Statements you made:
"That claim is what I contend IS NOT HAPPENING, and if you think there is a possibility it could be happening (as claimed) you are sorely mistaken..."
Tests you said you made that prove your statement of fact:
"I conducted several tests, back in the 80s, to determine that "signal lines" were an imaginary entitiy".
As you stated,
the burden of proof lies with a person making a claim.
So where is your proof? You failed at the second request to prove your claims.
There are plenty of skeptics and LRL enthusiasts who would like to see the data from the tests you conducted that show definitive prove signal lines are an imaginary entity.
So I ask again:
How scientific was your test?
What did you use for a control?
Let's see a detailed report that shows your proof so we can also read the data to determine whether signal lines are an imaginary entity or not.
Or is is possible you never really made any scientific tests?
Are you simply making up tests you never performed like some LRL enthusiasts are reputed to do?
Shall we presume your claims are fake, and you really did not perform any tests to support them?
Best wishes,
J_P