Quote:
Originally Posted by J_Player
This also makes me wonder on what basis you determined your own conclusions. As near as I can tell, it is on circumstantial evidence and a strong bias. But definitely not based on any scientific tests you performed.
Best wishes,
J_P
|
As a matter of fact
I have conducted scientific tests on certain other commercial LRLs; just not the R-T Examiner.
However, just because I have not personally tested an Examiner, does not categorically disqualify me from rendering my opinion based on lots of previous experiences with similar contraptions.
Think of it this way.... I've never been to Australia either, but I've seen enough evidence to allow me to believe it does in fact exist, and were I to buy a plane ticket for Australia, I'm confident that is where I would end up.
The point is, one does not have to necessarily personally experience something to draw on their previous experience and observations; and make an informed opinion (conclusion).
(Not to mention the fact, Carl M. has already done a very in-depth study of the Examiner; and I trust what he reported as accurate and truthful.)