@ Morgan
We shouldn't call it: "POOR MANS GOLD ION LOCATOR" but "SMART MANS GOLD ION LOCATOR" - poor are those after buying such devices for thousands of dollars.
About the "gold resonance factor":
The best way would be to put some piece of goldprobe into an peanuts-can sized ion-chamber and anayze the results like with radioactive probe. This wouldn't require extremly high sensitivity and could show us the right way.
But the big question is: What makes the gold-ions different from the huge rest and how much "go through solid material"-power they have.
Afaik the Zahori has no frequency at all, especially not the Mini-Zahori, because it measures the voltage field and it could became really complex for instance to measure just the electrostatic field between 1000-10000Volts.
@ WM6
Quote:
Not dr Faustus, but dr. Falst --> dr. Falsificatus.
|
That's clear, 'cause for you is everything false, Dr. Pseudo-Verificatus.
@ J_Player
Thx for the links, I will read them. (edit: they are don't giving much or reliable information)
Nice work you've done here in illustrating the possible "fake show" - we just won't come any further by pure speculations. The shovel also could have been used to mark the gold ring for finding it again if the Bionic not will work or so the viewer knows that the goldring really is at this special location.
Not to forget he uses the Bionic 01 and I'm speaking about the Alpha, which already claims it does NOT works for really far distances, but instead also can detect other metals, too.
The price is a topic on its own. A small 10ct emerald also could cost ya 10.000 dollars! Same with very rare collection objects or hitec prototype stuff.
If you have the money get your darling a ring for 10.000 bucks - but it's nothing essential (ok, under some circumstances it might be...)
The big question is: it is worth the high price or not!
Yes it is, but only if you will find valuable stuff for shure and not just for holding on to a dream that never comes true.
But I think such a high price is a pretty good justification that the expensive LRL HAS TO WORK as described otherwise the unsatisfied customer has a very good reason for going immediatly to court or getting his money back! The more it costs the more money would be lost or "stolen" if it doesn't work and therefore the higher the "punishment" for a fraud-company has to be - this can tell you any lawyer.
Before buying a LRL always ask your lawyer how you can stay on the safe side...
Anyway, if this discussion will go on further that highly controvers without clear and secured facts the only way out would be testing this device on my own - and believe me, I don't let deceive myself, I know how to test such stuff "foolproved".
I also wouldn't buy some Mineoro if it claims to detect "fresh gold"

(sorry, but "fresh" usually is vegetable or fruits but no gold!

) and it just beeps randomly.
btw. OKM tells on its website that the Bionic Alpha uses three different detection methods you can select, if those don't work alltogether.
It may have been my fault to post the links to the Bionic 01 clips but from now on we should focus on the Alpha and after we know exactly how and if it works we can proceed to the Bionic 01. btw. "DetectionServices" also shows some "BabyFinder" test and it does not look like he wants to deceive any persons in this video:
http://www.youtube.com/user/Detectio.../1/zKzqKl2A5CM
Other topic:
Yesterday I made some outdoor test with my fruitbox-detector (of course this is just a prototype for experimenting, the final device will look totally different) - but now connected with a 1-100 pF variable capacitor. The large electricity line made a noise like a helicopter! Tuning the capacitor (connected between +9V, an 1k resistor and the base alias gate of the FET) brought alot but not enough to eliminate such highpower signals completly.
But it works and now the next step is finding the best "directional antenna" and balance of the circuit so it really can detect conductive or static-field-distorting metal below the ground. If this is done at least we will know for shure if an electrostatic or Zahori detector works, how good and what kind of antenna-improvements have to be made.
Anyone here already has some field reports how his electrostatic-detector worked out in the field or what kind of problems did occure?! If I remember right ivconic built one but wasn't very satisfied with the detection results.
btw. detecting the static or the ions uses almost or the same circuit, so it could be possible adding just two different antennas (the ion-tube also is one) to the same device! We will find out.