Quote:
Originally Posted by Fred
Hi G-sani,
I think there is a big misunderstanding here : the difference is between if these LRL works on a technical point of view, and on the other side on the human point of view.
You assure us it works on the human side, and i believe you.
But i am still waiting to see a technical proof that it really works.
As Qiaozhi said, as long as you know where the target is ,and unless you wrote every test you made in everyplace, results cannot be taken in account.
|
Fred, I never wrote the tests I made in everyplace because the results are interesting me more.
Well it is sure that my other LRL(freq. generator) holds a technical proof since it gives me numbers on a meter when the material in search is present.
Sorry I can not help in that since I don't know how it is been made or in what principle it is based.Simply I don't care and I am busy digging targets instead of trying to see why it works.Apart from that I don't want to open it.
The only thing I can say is that whenever gave us a target we found it and proved right using our rods to follow the signal to the target.
Of course someone can say that may be there are times that it gives us nothing and may be the material in search exists in some place and we never know it.Well this holds truth and I have to admit it.
But then how can always proved right when the receiving signal gives as a meter reading?
Now when it comes to examiner I have to see it first, I cannot say anything yet but let me ask you something.
If it works for example that means I have dowsing abillities?
Well it is only me I can judge that and the only thing I can do for you is to let you know.
Believe me or not is a different story.
Since the beggining of time humans discovered many things just by experimenting and without knowing always the explaination behind them.
Of course some of them hold technical proofs but do you think that we always know it from the beggining?
Or is that a reason to stop using them? We understand things different as time passes by and we always adjust accordingly.
Weakness of understanting the technical point of view of a working LRL shouldn't stop us using it.
This is completely different policy than the one of skeptics.
Whatever they don't understand they say that it is not working and they will never try it themselves.
