Quote:
Originally Posted by Theseus
You said; "when somebody is Treasure hunting he wants mainly to see their practical side of things and he doesn't like theories that can never put down in practice."
Treasure hunting requires an expenditure of time and usually significant monetary resources. I'm not one who likes to waste either time or money. Therefore, before I go into the field, I only make sure I am using tools that have been tried and tested, and that I am confident will perform as claimed or advertised. If the tools used were never tested under controlled conditions, how could I know they were worth depending on in conditions that are not controlled? The answer is simple; I could not.
Actual projects in the field, under varying conditions is not the place to evaluate tools of any kind, especially LRL implements. Unless of course you are not concerned with real conclusions and only want to verify a theory of operation. In which case, conclusions and results reached in that manner have no value whatsoever to the serious treasure hunter.
|
Of course if money was not involved then it would be no problem at all.
I spent much money myself buying detectors and I know very well how expensive this hobby is.
But from my experience up to now I can say that tests of LRLs differ from person to person and it is the very slightest difference in the way that somebody uses them that give the different results in the same tests.
This in turn brings up to the average mind the case that somebody writes in favour of something and then who you believe.
One thing is for sure the more somebody reads about the subject the more he learns.
So Keep talking.