Quote:
Originally Posted by hipopp
So how far away from the object do you have to be? i can place a small nuggett 6 feet away on top of the ground and tell myself the nuggett is not there and the RT cannot pick it up...what is this gobbledegook about magnetic interference? at 6 feet in plain view on top of the ground? it is all in the head!!! no amount of scientific testing will bypass the fact that results are only achieved unless the operator "tells" the aerial to lock onto something. Target field of strength has absolutely nothing to do with it since i thought i found a quartz reef at 3-400 meters yet cannot find a simple nuggett or coin(s) six feet away. The last time i went back to relocate my quartz reef it was not there someone had obviously stolen it. My precious nuggett is still lost somewhere in my lounge room where the Mrs. cannot remember where she put it last(to be located by me) however i did find some coin and pins and buttons stuffed deep down in a couple of lounge chairs, found with my fingers not the RT by the way. JP is going to waste his time trying to replicate results he gets because the device does not do a thing. his head will be doing everything. Just remeber JP the early models came out without calculators stuck on top so according to Blanes they work quite well with no settings required. Now you are left with a snivelling swivelling aerial that you are going to watch going round and round and round and round and round while Blanes is laughing his head off in the comfort of his home, another sucker to lead by the nose because he knows the whole contraption is just so much Junk and his only aim is to protect his income and bank balance. 1300 RT's by average $600 equals $780,000. Rather good pocket money. There are two reasons why i have not published the results of 300 hours of testing on this site. Firstly they may be used in the future in legal proceedings. Secondly, I did not want obviously well educated persons on this site laughing at the absolute stupidity and gull;ibility that led me to buy such a ridiculously stupid device. Nothing can be proved with the device aother than it can do anything that your head allows it to do. Point it at a rock lock on...point it at a rock do not lock on, it does not lock on. point it at a mountainside tell it to lock on and it does..mountain must be full of emeralds and rubies from the Inca days. Tell it not to lock on and it does not...someone must have crept into the mountain while you were having a smoke and stole all the inca treasure. Garbage and drivel and more garbage this device is a product of a very sick mind...go back to the language that Blanes used in the past in the interests of customer service...he is very obviously a sick man, not just a con artist but a very sick paranoid. His help desk is where he invents ideas to keep you strung out till you give up...the device is not working because..the atmospherics , the ground, other minerals in the area, your body, calculator settings ..even your attitude!! he can string you out for longer than you as a rational person can handle it and you give up and he keeps your money, our money. His day has come he will be on national TV here in Australia it is just a matter of time. He is going to join all the other scam artists that lack normal human conscience and dwell in the realm of the animal kingdom.
|
Hipopp, I cannot disagree with your assessment of the Ranger Tell Examiner. I have personally never used, or field tested one. If I were to evaluate the Examiner, I would probably be far less impartial than J Player is being only because I have had many years of Treasure Hunting Field experience and comparative testing of LRL's, so I already know the differences in performances, what to expect, how they should function, and the conditions and limitations in which they will, or will not function accurately, or at all.
I don't put much stock in advertising hype.
I can only speak from my own experience. First and foremost, is that LRL's are dumb, stupid, devices. They have no intelligence of their own. Any of them, including my own will only be as good as the intelligence, knowledge, experience, and sometimes luck of the person operating it.
My own products are totally dependent on the success, and satisfaction of my customers. Informing costumers of a products limitations, BEFORE they buy, so the consumer does not have Un-realistic expectations is all important. Apparently this didn't happen in your case, and for that I can sympathize with your predicament.
From the photo of the Examiner, and the swivel handle, I can see where it would be very easy to mentally influence the direction the Examiner points by tilting the hand one way , or other, via a sub-conscious ideomotor muscle response. This can take some learning to overcome, but it is not to say the examiner does not detect, or discriminate the "field" of a target. I don't know. I would have to conduct my own tests.
I can state with assurance, and from experience, there are conditions when any LRL, electronic, or non-electronic, will function poorly, or not at all, and that includes the ones I make. Always use a test target, and keep checking the strength of Field. It does not matter if you are checking from 1 foot away, or 30 feet away. If you don't detect the test target, you won't detect an unknown target.
You are already ahead of the Skeptics on this forum. They claim LRL operators will always detect a visible test target, but never a hidden or unknown target. It appears that has not been your experience, and it's certainly not mine.
I'm truly sorry your experience with the Ranger Tell company, or their product has been an unpleasant one. Dell