Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Jim
With all due respect...your tests will be claimed invalid if the results are not in favor of this gimmick...regardless if you follow scientific protocol or not.
That's just my opinion, of course
|
You might be right about that. I don't know because I haven't done any real tests yet. So far there have only been a couple of preliminary unofficial tests. I have also done a couple of electronic bench tests I can make public when I have confirmation the Examiner is working ok.
But I plan to avoid making lots of invalid field tests. I will only be making a very few test of my own. I basically will try it out, and if I get the feeling it is helping me find treasures, I will buy it. Most of the real testing will be done by other people who volunteer to try out the Examiner. This will give us a good cross section of a lot of different people with different backgrounds to check the performance of the Examiner. There won't be any one person who does all the testing to invalidate it.
From the preliminary unofficial tests, I observed others do better than me at locating gold so far. So I figure I should stay in the background as an observer who records the results rather than exposing the Examiner to my poor performance compared to others. This will leave me free to make close observations and record how the LRL is performing, while practicing up on breathing exercizes that Mike(Mont) recommends to get better performance. Maybe I will become as good as others using the Examiner after observating their methods, and after enough practice with breathing exercizes.
Best wishes,
J_P