Quote:
Originally Posted by J_Player
Nope, you didn't say dowsing. But this is exactly what skeptics are saying when they hear your words. Personally I just don't feel like wading through more dowsing debates when we have more important business at hand, so I would rather save the yoga/meditation stuff until the initial testing is done.
Well then, I s'pose my trials will be done by a skeptic oozing with negativity, per Mike(Mont)'s appraisal. But don't despair, even if the Rangrtell Examiner works perfectly without breathing exercises as the factory says it will, I will still try your suggestions toward the end of the test program. Who knows, maybe your suggestions will change me into the kind of person you consider the ideal earth being.
In the mean time, I will consider the manufacturer to be the authority on how to use his products, and I will give him a fair shot with testing done to his standards by more people than just myself. When time permits I will be holding some demonstration events where treasure hunting skeptics as well as LRL enthusiasts will be invited to try their hand at the RangerTell Examiner. You will be invited too. This will allow you to demonstrate your techniques to show without a doubt how well they work.
I can guarantee all the skeptics watching will be anxious to learn your methods after they see your outstanding performance recovering gold with the Examiner. And it will be a good chance for all the LRL enthusiasts to point their fingers at skeptics and laugh "I told you so". You may make LRL history if your methods work. 
Ummm... I have no plan to try to remember anything during the tests. Once the Examiner is set, I plan to let it do it's thing and find the target. I have no reason to focus on the antenna or treasure or anything else. Maybe I will occasionally stop to check whether I am following the manufacturer's instructions. Personally, I don't see anything difficult about it at all as long as I am not trying to remember a lot of stuff.
Best wishes,
J_P |
Way to go J_P, you are approaching the testing procedure
EXACTLY the way I would do it, if I were doing the testing. The inventor/manufacturer should know best how to operate his own instrument, and his instructions should be followed precisely. That is the only fair way to evaluate the instrument.
I was once involved in the testing of an LRL/MFD device, where I made my test procedure and results public (after getting permission from the inventor). One or two chastised me for certain facets of the test procedure, because it didn't fit "their" idea of how it should be tested. I then reminded them that I followed the recommendations from the inventor exactly, and that if anyone should know how it should be tested, it would only be the inventor. Probably you've guessed by now.... the device did not operate as advertised, or claimed. Mike and others will contend that the fault lies with me the tester because of negative vibs and all the other silly excuses; but the inventor DID NOT make any such stipulations about my vibs either negative or positive. When (or if) the Examiner fails to operate correctly for you; you will hear the same things.
