View Single Post
  #56  
Old 11-15-2009, 03:03 PM
Qiaozhi's Avatar
Qiaozhi Qiaozhi is offline
Guru (Administrator)
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,650
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by hung View Post
It's impressive how the name Rangertell raises hairs in (pretend to be scientific) ''geoskepthics' who to date, could not even understand simple basic laws on why it possibly works.

Carl: Don't waste your time in this discussion. We all know what you
think you know about the device. Just say it 'does not work', but
please don''try to explain your scientific reasons for the hundredth
time. Save your own exposure. I'm sorry.

Hippop: Please post your 300 hour test report. These tests were actually
performed and there's a report about it as you promised, or was it
all 'propaganda'?

Whatever this discussion turns out, we all know the end. There will be no end.
The ones who know it works and why it works, such as I, will go on their lives normally as well as the others who think it does not.
This discussion generates lots of publicity in forums and might be a sucess someday on TV, but don't count on me to perpetuate this.
All I had to say about this subject I already did. Nothing else to add.

Regards.
Is this another attempt at debunkering?
Hmmm... maybe not.

The only basic laws to understanding why the RT possibly works have nothing to do with physics. By "work" I can only assume that you are referring to its ability to discover treasure just once ... during the initial sale to another unsuspecting sucker. If you are instead referring to the detection of treasure in the field, then you are living in cloud cuckoo land.
Reply With Quote