Hi Esteban,

Yes, scientists told us. There are more than 1 million online pages showing what scientists told us about this. We also have books written since the turn of the century showing the association between underground metal or other geological anomalies and variations in magnetic fields, electric fields, RF and other measurable effects. In the late 1920s through the 1950s many researchers published their findings showing how radio broadcast waves were influenced by anomalies of metal and other geological formations below the ground as well as above the ground.

I don't know who you are referring to when you say "we". But if you are referring to the early researchers from late 1800s through 1950, then I suppose you are correct. After many years of taking field measurements, they did empirically conclude that the phenmomenon is complex, judging from their publications and the diagrams they drew to chart the resulting anomalies in the RF fields.

Best wishes,
J_P

Spherical objects as old rings also are better detectable. Don't understand why you need wait between each experiment.

I say "we" because no learning in "very" scientific materials. The most are pressumptions... of course based on characteristics of metals as conductivity...

This dependence on physical shape would imply that eddy currents are an important aspect in detection ... but, at the distances you are discussing, any eddy currents would be miniscule and undetectable.

Don't know if eddy currents are useful factor in electronic LRL...

The scientists made no presumptions when they took soil samples and used chemicals titrations and very precise calibrated electronic instruments to detect the presence of metal ions. These were observed results, not presmptions. They made no presumptions when they observed these metal ions are no longer ions at the surface. They measured the weight of metal compounds that they found, and the absence of metal ions at the surface or above, unlike the presence of metal ions they measured and observed taking column shapes below the surface.

Are you sure they presumed these ions are located in the columns where they claim they measured them? Are you sure they were presuming there is not a metal ion anomaly at or above the surface when their tests failed to find any metal ions above the surface?

Best wishes,
J_P

Because if you want to try a new shape you have to dig and replace the object, but by doing so you destroy the phenomenon, right?

Yes, and material would not be so important i think:aluminium is a good conductor too.But irregular shapes helps to leak HV.

No, I made sometimes presumptions. No the scientifics, even if sometimes they suspect about some phenomenons based on previous knowledges...

No, you can test it finding objects "natural" buried. You go on locations and try the detectors.

A clue ? :lol:

I think explaination is about easy... and empiric...

Iron rust and dissolves over the years if not thick or compact enough. So not big issue...

Aluminium production was just by after 1825 (though the electricity required to product it made its diffusion before 1900 very rare in the world... if not impossible to find in many places , including Paraguay).

So, always assuming the LRLs work as he said, the OLD buried aluminium is max 100 years old there... but probably much is just from less than 60years... foil... pull-tabs etc
Sure not few time... but enough to develop a strong halo or "phenomenon" ?

He wrote of 30years old cans if I remember well... in that case seems the cans developed strong halo stuff...

I, indeed think that aluminium is really easy detectable if bronze or copper are, don't forget that gold have similar magnetic behaviour as aluminium... that's why using too much disc in an VLF to avoid pull-tabs (aluminium) it's really likly kill your gold ring founds too! :D

Kind regards,
Max

Here is not rare the aluminium... beer cans exist since decades and other 1,000 kinds of kitchen recipients made from him, but not all the pistols detects it. The absorptive pistol can detect items buried 5-10 years. I remember I detect with it very easy a Nintendo token with a new coin, the both in the same place, one very near the other, "in touch", but seems also here exist a kind of bimetalic effect, because this detection was very very clear. But a "cemetery" of beer cans don't be detected, I surrounded it, and zero detection.

Capt.Poo
 

Hi Captain p00p

I think the other skeptics are learning something about LRL,but you become each time more and more BURRO ...

Max disturb RS forum
 

Is any way to put MAX out of the RS project ?
He already said PD is a CRAP,so he is only disturbing people here.
I vote against Max in RS project

Hi J_P.
I would like at least other 2 persons, not alone. It is different if 3 or more persons check the PD from Morgan and say "OK, it work", and different if only Geo see it. Some people will say maybe Geo did not saw well, maybe he is friend with Morgan etc.

Regards:)

But also "he" is friend with ivconic - the sceptic! :lol: So...I know Geo is descent man and he will act fair about this.
Geo it is very good idea - trip to Portugal.
I am very sorry cose i can't afford it right now.
It is not the question of beleive and faith here. It is just good more people to examine it. More eyes,more brains, more experiences, more knowledge.
So..i am looking forward to hear news. Also, you bring camera and shot some videos so later to put on youtube or here.
Soon as i collect enough informations on this, i would start making it and try to achieve some results. Of course; this forum would be the place to post experiences.

Max was very much a part of the original back-engineering. Without him we would not have the amount of information that we have today. It was a real team effort. So ... Captain p00p, or not :lol: ... as long as the really negative comments stay in the open forum that's ok.

Hey Morgan,

If Max was going to be voted out of the RS forum, then Qiaozhi would have to face the same fate.
He does not learn, chooses to remain ignorant and worse, contributes so the others remain ignorant also.

At least Max, although skepthic and ignorant about the science behind LRLs, is not 'cocky' and materialistic minded as Ozzy. Max's only problem is his silly jokes about Esteban's posts. But I guess it's just a self defense against what he can't comprehend.

Now one will wonder why no critical info will ever be post in these forums.

Hi hung,

So what is Qiaozhi supposed to learn?
You want him to learn the critical info you post when you debunker science?
Qiaozhi started this thread by quoting the information you posted to debunker someone's misconception about gold: From: http://www.geotech1.com/forums/showp...8&postcount=41

I think you posted false information about the properties of gold. And I also think Qiaozhi is correct when he implies that gold does not have DNA, nor does gold DNA produce any protective substance. But maybe I am wrong to think Qiaozhi is correct and you are wrong. Maybe I am unable to learn what you teach also.

Do you believe Qiaozhi should abandon what he was taught about gold in science classes, and learn the facts you want us to believe so we can have the same critical information that you have?

Best wishes,
J_P

As long as no critical info will be posted, you will not be taken seriously.
But i think it´s you masochist side and you like it :D

'Learning' is a process someone chooses to absorb or not, subjectively speaking, a piece of information based (and corroborated) by their own survey.

'Respect', objectively speaking, for other's own ideas and experiences is the least expected in this forum regarding 'etiquette'.

When one faces a piece of information which he does not agrees or ignores, 'I don't agree' and 'I don't have sufficient data to coment on' are the words that should be used. The wise, remains silent upon what he does not know.
Qiaozhi, since the start of his appearances chose to attack the proponent, discarding politeness.

He may remain ignoring LRL subjects as he wish...But 'respect' is a word he can no longer choose to ignore.

Hi hung,

I have not remained silent, because I do know. I would feel stupid if I said 'I don't agree' and 'I don't have sufficient data to coment on' the DNA of gold.
The fact is I do have sufficient data. Gold DNA does not exist!
At least that is what I believe based on the properties of gold that I was taught.

Can you explain your own ideas and experiences with gold that might convince Qiaozhi or the rest of us forum readers that gold has DNA that produces a substance to protect it?

Best wishes,
J_P

Yes I know. I was refering to Qiaozhi's 'memorabilia' on dowsing for instance.

This is a private survey I'm involved.
I have absolutely no interest whasoever in discussing it or convincing anyone about it. But even if I did have... no, I beleive I would not be able to convince you or some skeptics here and I doubt it that I would ever be.
Too many other aspects involved which 'conventional' science still has no data. Sorry.
Gotta go now.

I agree with you Hung :shocked: ,
but then, how do you call this ? :
And many more...

I think you have been spending too much time emailing your hero Myron Evans .... isn't that true? ... Dr. Hung. :notalk:

:D I just posted the truth...about you and PD stuff... you posted fake informations, everybody knows.

Where's that 7th board, captain burro !? :rolleyes:

Kind regards,
Max