What is really phenomenon???????

[mustefa ubram]

hi to all
After much research in the field of remote detection .I reached good results
But the question that I was heavily thinking And perhaps the minds of many friends.
What is really phenomenon???????
Some say that the electromagnetic field:|Say some of the metal ions in the soil:|Some say there is no such a thing:|&....
Why magnetometer can detect magnetic metals in the soil But can not detect non-magnetic metals:oh:
What is the phenomenon that changes the resonant frequency of a LC circuit?

How is really revealed the phenomenon???
How the phenomenon intensifies???
AND.AND.AND.......??????
There are a lot of friends on this site that have high knowledge in this regard.

FRANCO ,GEO,WM6,NICOLAS,MORGAN,and other dear freinds

I want to all the friends that help to better understand the phenomenon.

What is really phenomenon???????

[edwgold]

Hi, to all!

I'm new, and want to give a small contribution from everything I've read.
Maybe the phenomenon came from inside of earth..

Read this patents:
1) http://www.freepatentsonline.com/6087833.pdf
2) http://www.freepatentsonline.com/4507611.pdf
3) http://www.freepatentsonline.com/4841250.pdf

Regards

Edward

P.D. I'm from Montevido-Uruguay

[Geo]

hi to all
After much research in the field of remote detection .I reached good results
But the question that I was heavily thinking And perhaps the minds of many friends.
What is really phenomenon???????
Some say that the electromagnetic field:|Say some of the metal ions in the soil:|Some say there is no such a thing:|&....
Why magnetometer can detect magnetic metals in the soil But can not detect non-magnetic metals:oh:
What is the phenomenon that changes the resonant frequency of a LC circuit?

How is really revealed the phenomenon???
How the phenomenon intensifies???
AND.AND.AND.......??????
There are a lot of friends on this site that have high knowledge in this regard.

FRANCO ,GEO,WM6,NICOLAS,MORGAN,and other dear freinds

I want to all the friends that help to better understand the phenomenon.

What is really phenomenon???????

Hi.
Phenomenon..... ??????
Esteban said that he called phenomenon, the conditions under which an old object burried for a long time can be detectable from a long distance. Now what is changes if the object is buried for long time??? maybe nobody knows exactly. Sometimes there is a strong magnetic field, other times a strong electric field etc.....


:)

[taxma1981]

http://s23.postimg.org/n7742ifev/20151029_232222.jpg (http://postimg.org/image/n7742ifev/)

[Sneshko]

Hi, to all!

I'm new, and want to give a small contribution from everything I've read.
Maybe the phenomenon came from inside of earth..

Read this patents:
1) http://www.freepatentsonline.com/6087833.pdf
2) http://www.freepatentsonline.com/4507611.pdf
3) http://www.freepatentsonline.com/4841250.pdf

Regards

Edward

P.D. I'm from Montevido-Uruguay

Dear Edward!
Thank you nearly split the patented projects!
All the best!
Sneshko

[WM6]

According glossary, phenomenons are:

1. a fact, occurrence, or circumstance observed or observable: "to study the phenomena of nature"

2. something that is impressive or extraordinary.


No doubt that all sort of claimed remote detecting cases, published at this forum or somewhere else, are phenomenon.

Main question is: are all those storytelling phenomenon proven or not.

[Geo]

According glossary, phenomenons are:

1. a fact, occurrence, or circumstance observed or observable: "to study the phenomena of nature"

2. something that is impressive or extraordinary.


No doubt that all sort of claimed remote detecting cases, published at this forum or somewhere else, are phenomenon.

Main question is: are all those storytelling phenomenon proven or not.

Many people (and me) saw the results of phenomenon many times. I think that this is a prove, but our job is not to prove it theoretically.

[WM6]

Many people (and me) saw the results of phenomenon many times. I think that this is a prove, but our job is not to prove it theoretically.

Agree Geo,

phenomenon need to be observed in real world, to even talk about it.

After phenomenon observed, next step is to explain it correctly, so we are back to basic theory.

To explain phenomenon correctly, we need to check different things (better before than after), par example: our observing procedure, observing means, observing conclusions, real observing object, observing conditions, illusions impact etc. In all those check steps can go something wrong and lead to wrong end-conclusion.

Wrong approach, to quick conclusion, etc. could be OK, if we need sedative for our restless soul. But what, if we need truth and nothing else than truth. Then we face with problems, which are usually in form of self-misleading-conclusions about our observation in fact that our LRL is non-working and our phenomenon non-existent.

At the end "what you see, is what you get" is valid here too: if you see illusion, you get illusion - nothing else. Who's care, our whole life is illusion too.

[Geo]

Hi Jaka.
I tired from all this story. Now not care me to prove anything. I have 2 lrls that works very good so i am ok. If i"ll come to Borovnica will take them with me for a demostration. Before 1 week i was at Skopia and Beogrand and i wanted to come until your country but i had not so many free days. Maybe next year!!!

Regards:)

[WM6]

Pity Geo.

You could join refugees train and came here at free ticket (plus all inclusive).

I know Geo, all this is old, endless story, which repeated many times. Seems we live in time domain and boring time should be killed in one or another way. We all need dreams, to go through heavy days and moments easier. It is nothing wrong with dreams. We only need to keep our dreams cheap and don't allow malicious others to push us to over-expensive (mineoro-like) dream ways.

[sinclairuser]

maybe quantum entanglement has an effect here, just suppose for a minute that multi- universes exist.
in that case you have found that object many times before in other quantum realities, so you may be predisposed to recover that object, the method used dowsing, crackpot devices or even a metal detector is immaterial since you would have always found the object.
that would explain why someone can appear to find objects with their "chosen device" while others fail, or better still find it "eyes only".
i much prefer this idea myself. though to some this interpretation is just as looney tunes as the rest.
aly.

[Bill512]

these grids are near to a big and heavy metallic object (known) with a special "receiver".
Two slightly different antennas were used, the second was better.
The real scale is 8.5 X 3 meters.
Similar measurements were taken on unknown "targets"- these strange fringes was observed also , but not at all targets.
It looks like some interference pattern,which extends several meters from the target.
In one case in the field, these patterns was recorded at +-17 meters approx, from the center of the anomaly .
So, not really a long range system but rather an alternative strange system.
(sorry, I can not reveal for the moment the details for this system).

[brasilpb]

http://blog.novaeletronica.com.br/img/Detector-de-Fantasma-e1405111119506.gif

http://www.spaziofantasias.com.br/files/fantasia/grande_ADULT%20SASSY%20GHOSTBUSTERS.jpg

They say that where there is a treasure, always have a guardian spirit, and a detector of ions, or electromagnetic loads, could detect these spirits, and at the same time, finding the treasure.

[Geo]

Hi Brasilpb.
Do you mean that the second photo is a guardian spirit???:lol:

[Geo]

these grids are near to a big and heavy metallic object (known) with a special "receiver".
Two slightly different antennas were used, the second was better.
The real scale is 8.5 X 3 meters.
Similar measurements were taken on unknown "targets"- these strange fringes was observed also , but not at all targets.
It looks like some interference pattern,which extends several meters from the target.
In one case in the field, these patterns was recorded at +-17 meters approx, from the center of the anomaly .
So, not really a long range system but rather an alternative strange system.
(sorry, I can not reveal for the moment the details for this system).

Very good Billy.
Continue the good work, we wait for your news.
(Maybe it is what most lrls detects at distances from 3 to 15m).

Regards :)

[brasilpb]

Hi Brasilpb.
Do you mean that the second photo is a guardian spirit???:lol: http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-zlmum4fWepg/UC1yK7XhBII/AAAAAAAABfQ/7H6HWSsfIRM/s1600/Os-Ca%C3%A7as-Fantasma.png

The second image is a ghost hunter, is only missing one thing, one fg90 in her hand!