View Full Version : NEW PD MADE IN GREECE
takhslambos
07-02-2011, 05:17 PM
THIS IS THE NEW PD MADE IN GREECE.....
takhslambos
07-02-2011, 05:26 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cY4lpB3ebSY&feature=player_detailpage#t=125s
Morgan
07-03-2011, 07:19 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cY4lpB3ebSY&feature=player_detailpage#t=125s
Hello
Is this one the Geo´s new PD???
Ok,nice,but lets see the field test,i simple cant believe in the 100m for a gold coin...
takhslambos
07-03-2011, 09:02 PM
NO IT IS NOT GEO S PD.
Qiaozhi
07-03-2011, 09:38 PM
I think it's from Andreas.
Look at the nickname of the person who posted it on youtube.
Barbarossa
07-05-2011, 05:01 PM
pd with antena of ikonos
aft_72005
07-06-2011, 04:21 AM
I think it's from Andreas.
Look at the nickname of the person who posted it on youtube.
Hi Qiaozhi
Yes , by Andreas . I saying congratulate to Andreas .
http://www.getsmile.com/emoticons/smileys-91853/aiw/good.gifhttp://www.getsmile.com/emoticons/smileys-91853/aiw/ok.gif
Best regards.
detectoman
07-07-2011, 06:30 AM
pretty design of andreas, esteban earlier say what andreas be good lrl and md builder, i think these is true, my congratulations andreas! andreas isnt of md conventional enginers team, these builders of toys movement detectors, ajaa, semms we the lrls lets coming winers
pretty design of andreas, esteban earlier say what andreas be good lrl and md builder, i think these is true, my congratulations andreas! andreas isnt of md conventional enginers team, these builders of toys movement detectors, ajaa, semms we the lrls lets coming winers
Hi detectoman, where you been so long? At Treasure Island?
Morgan
07-15-2011, 11:28 PM
Hi Qiaozhi
Yes , by Andreas . I saying congratulate to Andreas .
http://www.getsmile.com/emoticons/smileys-91853/aiw/good.gifhttp://www.getsmile.com/emoticons/smileys-91853/aiw/ok.gif
Best regards.
Very good that Andreas create his LRL MASTERPIECE .
Time will show if is a good LRL or NOT...
I supose Geo And Andreas will start competition,wich one is the best PD maker ;-)
What about to start the competition in the Olympus mountain ?...
15963
Morgan
07-15-2011, 11:47 PM
Hi Qiaozhi
Yes , by Andreas . I saying congratulate to Andreas .
http://www.getsmile.com/emoticons/smileys-91853/aiw/good.gifhttp://www.getsmile.com/emoticons/smileys-91853/aiw/ok.gif
Best regards.
Yes,today i check again in youtube and now i saw the name By Andreas Christi.
Very nice that he found the correct balance between Coil+ Ferrite and improve the Gain.
Anyway gold coin (fresh buried) up 100 meters ??????????????????????????????????
I need to see that to believe.
Hi aft_ do you know the price for one of this GreeK PD´s ????
Regards
aft_72005
07-16-2011, 04:39 AM
Yes,today i check again in youtube and now i saw the name By Andreas Christi.
Very nice that he found the correct balance between Coil+ Ferrite and improve the Gain.
Anyway gold coin (fresh buried) up 100 meters ??????????????????????????????????
I need to see that to believe.
Hi aft_ do you know the price for one of this GreeK PD´s ????
Regards
Hi Morgan
Movie begins with "Andreas Christi" letters. Yes, it done by Andreas.
No, I don’t know price .
Best regards.
Yes,today i check again in youtube and now i saw the name By Andreas Christi.
Very nice that he found the correct balance between Coil+ Ferrite and improve the Gain.
Anyway gold coin (fresh buried) up 100 meters ??????????????????????????????????
I need to see that to believe.
Hi aft_ do you know the price for one of this GreeK PD´s ????
Regards
Hi Morgan.
He made some tests (no video ) and as he said he located 2copper objects and a rusted iron from 10m long...... no 100m. A friend was with him so i believe the results except if was erratic signals.
Regards
Hi Morgan.
He made some tests (no video ) and as he said he located 2copper objects and a rusted iron from 10m long...... no 100m. A friend was with him so i believe the results except if was erratic signals.
Regards
Geo, look at post #3, it is from his video. His claim is 100m at 20cm depth. I believe in past that Andreas is serious man, but after this video it is evidently that he moved among the rogue traders.
Morgan
07-21-2011, 01:13 AM
Hi Morgan.
He made some tests (no video ) and as he said he located 2copper objects and a rusted iron from 10m long...... no 100m. A friend was with him so i believe the results except if was erratic signals.
Regards
Hello Geo
Thanks for report the fied test made by Andreas,and the new PD.
About the IRON,i have my experience with Alonso´s PD,sometimes is posible to find one iron target,but it must be allways with loop shape(create more intense field) and distance neve go more than one meter. If Andreas found one iron,exemple ,with NAIL shape,10m distance,something is wrong with this PD...
I wondering why he not participate in this forum for exchange of LRL ideias and projects.
Regards
Morgan
07-21-2011, 01:31 AM
Geo, look at post #3, it is from his video. His claim is 100m at 20cm depth. I believe in past that Andreas is serious man, but after this video it is evidently that he moved among the rogue traders.
About this 100m for gold coin,i think there is a mistake in this video,becouse at first we can see ,gold target detection 2X2 m,this is 4m,and is the reality. he made the mistake to put 100m .
Geo´s PD is similar,and his video shows gold coin detection 4-5 m.I think both PD´s working in the same principle,electromagnetic resonance.
About this 100m for gold coin,i think there is a mistake in this video,becouse at first we can see ,gold target detection 2X2 m,this is 4m,and is the reality. he made the mistake to put 100m .
Geo´s PD is similar,and his video shows gold coin detection 4-5 m.I think both PD´s working in the same principle,electromagnetic resonance.
Hi Morgan.
My PD is not similar with Andreas PD. My PD has not anything same with Alonsos PD or Iconos.
At video i detect a coin from 5m long but it has the ability to detect it from longer distance (this is it disadvantage).
After summer i will give here the new (and maybe the last) video from my modificated PD with a lot of tests.
Regards
Hello Geo
Thanks for report the fied test made by Andreas,and the new PD.
About the IRON,i have my experience with Alonso´s PD,sometimes is posible to find one iron target,but it must be allways with loop shape(create more intense field) and distance neve go more than one meter. If Andreas found one iron,exemple ,with NAIL shape,10m distance,something is wrong with this PD...
I wondering why he not participate in this forum for exchange of LRL ideias and projects.
Regards
Don't you know or don't you suppose???
Regards:)
Morgan
07-22-2011, 12:38 AM
Hi Morgan.
My PD is not similar with Andreas PD. My PD has not anything same with Alonsos PD or Iconos.
At video i detect a coin from 5m long but it has the ability to detect it from longer distance (this is it disadvantage).
After summer i will give here the new (and maybe the last) video from my modificated PD with a lot of tests.
Regards
Ok,sorry for my mistake.
But anyway your new PD is ready to find treasure ,let say,100m distance ???
alonso´s PD is the old TH dream,cant go more than 20m for treasure...
Need something better,i have the PDK,but want more distance.
Regards
Ok,sorry for my mistake.
But anyway your new PD is ready to find treasure ,let say,100m distance ???
alonso´s PD is the old TH dream,cant go more than 20m for treasure...
Need something better,i have the PDK,but want more distance.
Regards
I believe my PD to be OK on September, i will inform you by email.
btw.... what is the PDK???
Regards:)
Morgan
07-23-2011, 02:18 PM
I believe my PD to be OK on September, i will inform you by email.
btw.... what is the PDK???
Regards:)
The PDK is the same as Alonso´s PD,but working only beeper circuit+Passive Receiver,upgrade to the limits of sensitivity. works fine and more distance to big objects than the PD. Good advantaje to work automaticaly,no need critical adjustments.
Here is part of the circuit :
16033
16034
aft_72005
07-24-2011, 04:03 AM
The PDK is the same as Alonso´s PD,but working only beeper circuit+Passive Receiver,upgrade to the limits of sensitivity. works fine and more distance to big objects than the PD. Good advantaje to work automaticaly,no need critical adjustments.
Here is part of the circuit :
16033
16034
Hi Morgan
I congratulate for success with the "PDK "http://www.iranmicro.ir/forum/images/smilies/0011.gifhttp://www.iranmicro.ir/forum/images/smilies/good.gifhttp://www.getsmile.com/emoticons/smileys-91853/aiw/clapping.gif
J_Player
07-24-2011, 05:46 AM
Evolution of the home made pistol detector...
The PDK is the same as Alonso´s PD,but working only beeper circuit+Passive Receiver,upgrade to the limits of sensitivity. works fine and more distance to big objects than the PD. Good advantaje to work automaticaly,no need critical adjustments.
Here is part of the circuit :
Hi Morgan.
Thanks for photo.
I have something similar but with coil stimulator.
The basic disadvadage is that it want "old" burried object to work...
My new PD works and with fresh objects.
Regards
Morgan
07-26-2011, 01:06 AM
Hi Morgan.
Thanks for photo.
I have something similar but with coil stimulator.
The basic disadvadage is that it want "old" burried object to work...
My new PD works and with fresh objects.
Regards
Hello Geo
The PDK have COIL STIMULATOR,the photo not present the complete circuit.
I dont understand about your NEW PD,you say there is basic disavantage, it only detect fresh buried GOLD ??? maybe i understand something wrong?
Regards
Hi Morgan.
I speak about my old PD who is similar with your PDK.
My new PD has not problem with fresh gold
Regards
detectoman
07-28-2011, 04:26 AM
morgan, btw, your pd continue full of coulebras aspids crotals snakes and everything
Morgan
07-29-2011, 11:27 PM
morgan, btw, your pd continue full of coulebras aspids crotals snakes and everything
Yes,BUT IT WORKS,and your PD is EMPTY ;-)
Hasta la vista
batman1972
07-30-2011, 08:02 AM
Dear Geo
Can i have ur PD schematic,PCB,elements and all details?
I want to make it .
If u want,i will pay for it:)
my email is : Ronin060@yahoo.com
thanks and goodluck
hi. :) J_p have you made the plan of allonso did it work ? or not ? because I've seen four numbers of your detector pictures on site which of them works good .regard.
Morgan
08-20-2011, 11:18 PM
Hi Morgan.
He made some tests (no video ) and as he said he located 2copper objects and a rusted iron from 10m long...... no 100m. A friend was with him so i believe the results except if was erratic signals.
Regards
Hello Geo
After all i finish the PDK project sucessful.
Now is able to locate small gold objects at distances from 1.50m to 10m,and the big gold or silver ,from 20 m to 80m !!!
Field test today,was amazing ,the PDK locate the objects with acurate pinpoint,even better than we saw in Alonso´s film,and no erratic signals,no horizon efect.
And the good new,this PDK is fully automatic and no need critical adjustment to the limit of sensitivity.
Yes,this time i´m happy with the project ;-)
Morgan
08-20-2011, 11:25 PM
Hello Geo
After all i finish the PDK project sucessful.
Now is able to locate small gold objects at distances from 1.50m to 10m,and the big gold or silver ,from 20 m to 80m !!!
Field test today,was amazing ,the PDK locate the objects with acurate pinpoint,even better than we saw in Alonso´s film,and no erratic signals,no horizon efect.
And the good new,this PDK is fully automatic and no need critical adjustment to the limit of sensitivity.
Yes,this time i´m happy with the project ;-)
Well,but the PDK cant locate one fresh buried gold coin 10 m distance,and your PD ,and the new Andreas PD can do the job,so i win the game in 3rd place ;-)
GOLD MEDAL for GEO
SILVER MEDAL for ANDREAS
BRONZE MEDAL for MORGAN
and BIG THANKS for ESTEBAN
16312
Morgan
08-20-2011, 11:44 PM
Hi Morgan.
I speak about my old PD who is similar with your PDK.
My new PD has not problem with fresh gold
Regards
I want to make the field test film as soon as possible for everybody to see the PDK .
But need to buy new digital camera.
Its time for TH ;-)
16313
nelson
08-21-2011, 01:02 AM
¡Congratulations Morgan!
You has Esteban and Morgan, you have done an excelllent job.
Keep going guys and accept my best wishes for the comming proyects.
Regards
Nelson
Hello Geo
After all i finish the PDK project sucessful.
Now is able to locate small gold objects at distances from 1.50m to 10m,and the big gold or silver ,from 20 m to 80m !!!
Field test today,was amazing ,the PDK locate the objects with acurate pinpoint,even better than we saw in Alonso´s film,and no erratic signals,no horizon efect.
And the good new,this PDK is fully automatic and no need critical adjustment to the limit of sensitivity.
Yes,this time i´m happy with the project ;-)
Morgan
08-21-2011, 01:53 AM
¡Congratulations Morgan!
You has Esteban and Morgan, you have done an excelllent job.
Keep going guys and accept my best wishes for the comming proyects.
Regards
Nelson
Hi Nelson
My sucess with PDK happens becouse i try in the circuit things that others never understand and never tryed before,this is becouse i´m not electronic engenieer.
16315
aft_72005
08-21-2011, 04:58 AM
I want to make the field test film as soon as possible for everybody to see the PDK .
But need to buy new digital camera.
Its time for TH ;-)
16313
Hi Morgan
I congratulate to you , for your successfully with the "PDK".http://www.itc3.com/images/smilies/itech20%20(51).gifhttp://www.iranmicro.ir/forum/images/smilies/good.gifhttp://www.iranmicro.ir/forum/images/smilies/0011.gif
I am interesting see movie and more pictures form your new design .http://www.iranmicro.ir/forum/images/smilies/018.gif
I think , If you having camera with your mobile phone , no need buy and pay more
Money for digital camera . http://www.itc3.com/images/smilies/itech%20(53).gif
Best Regards.
mehdi
08-21-2011, 07:17 AM
Hello Geo
After all i finish the PDK project sucessful.
Now is able to locate small gold objects at distances from 1.50m to 10m,and the big gold or silver ,from 20 m to 80m !!!
Field test today,was amazing ,the PDK locate the objects with acurate pinpoint,even better than we saw in Alonso´s film,and no erratic signals,no horizon efect.
And the good new,this PDK is fully automatic and no need critical adjustment to the limit of sensitivity.
Yes,this time i´m happy with the project ;-)
Hi Morgan
congratulate , excellent work:)
all the best
mehdi
michael
08-21-2011, 07:32 AM
Hi dear Morgan.If so, it really deserves high congratulations. I hope best success for you, good man and willingly waiting for video demos.
Morgan
08-21-2011, 02:50 PM
Hi dear Morgan.If so, it really deserves high congratulations. I hope best success for you, good man and willingly waiting for video demos.
Hello Michael
The improvments in PDK circuit (the Passive Receiver) make this device extremly powerfull to electromagnetic fields and the Phenomena.
What i can say THIS IS AMAZING !!!
I get the signals and the PDK can stay beeping in the spot direction without losing the signal,and pinpoint the object with matematical precision ,this is my best LRL i ever use in my prospections.8)
Very soon,the videos.
Morgan
08-21-2011, 03:06 PM
Hi Morgan
congratulate , excellent work:)
all the best
mehdi
Hello
The PDK project is the development of the Alonso´s Passive Receiver,into the upgrade stage . The Passive Receiver project was started by Esteban,he found the way to make it better for treasures,but everybody who build it,find that is not possible locate single coins or small objects. So,i stay around the PDK project more than two years,and to the finaly extremly sensitive stage,powerful enough to locate small objects,this was possible only with adition of oscillator(it makes the RX much more powerful).
But other modifications,not only the oscillator.
Morgan
08-21-2011, 05:15 PM
Hi Morgan
I congratulate to you , for your successfully with the "PDK".http://www.itc3.com/images/smilies/itech20%20(51).gifhttp://www.iranmicro.ir/forum/images/smilies/good.gifhttp://www.iranmicro.ir/forum/images/smilies/0011.gif
I am interesting see movie and more pictures form your new design .http://www.iranmicro.ir/forum/images/smilies/018.gif
I think , If you having camera with your mobile phone , no need buy and pay more
Money for digital camera . http://www.itc3.com/images/smilies/itech%20(53).gif
Best Regards.
My PDK
16324
16325
detectoman
08-22-2011, 04:22 AM
morgan hermano me da gusto que hayas conseguido el exito, mucho has trabajado en esto, ,muy bien te lo mereces champion, despues de que alonso y estaban y andreas y geo y otros, han expandido el pdk
morgan im very happy for your sucess, very much you has working in these, my congratulations for you, youre champions
detectoman
08-22-2011, 04:27 AM
ya nadamas nos falta hermanito aft72005 que la ponga a funcionar
may be soon brodhy aft72005 too put these stuff to work
Qiaozhi
08-22-2011, 11:25 AM
I want to make the field test film as soon as possible for everybody to see the PDK .
But need to buy new digital camera.
Its time for TH ;-)
We eagerly await the video. :hat
nelson
08-22-2011, 11:42 AM
With no doubs you have done a try an error project that finally got his reward.
I m not an electronic engenieer too, but i will keep invetigating and working on this matter, so i hope i can achive in the future success like you have done.
I will also like to know how do you test PDK? I mean if you have a test bed for testing sensibility of PDK and made some mods.? Can you detect fresh gols and silver?
Congratulations and i will PM later after work.
Best regards
Nelson
Hi Nelson
My sucess with PDK happens becouse i try in the circuit things that others never understand and never tryed before,this is becouse i´m not electronic engenieer.
16315
nelson
08-22-2011, 12:08 PM
Hi Morgan.
Tell me, what material is the box you are using to place the circuit. Yours looks like a plastic box.
Best regards
Nelson
My PDK
16324
16325
Morgan
08-23-2011, 12:02 AM
morgan hermano me da gusto que hayas conseguido el exito, mucho has trabajado en esto, ,muy bien te lo mereces champion, despues de que alonso y estaban y andreas y geo y otros, han expandido el pdk
morgan im very happy for your sucess, very much you has working in these, my congratulations for you, youre champions
Yes,was more than two years around this project.
I must say BIG THANKS to ESTEBAN, MUCHAS GRACIAS,for his precious threads with informations,not complet,but in the good LRL way :)
16340
Morgan
08-23-2011, 12:07 AM
ya nadamas nos falta hermanito aft72005 que la ponga a funcionar
may be soon brodhy aft72005 too put these stuff to work
Hombre de Dios,solamente un pequeno cambyo en el P.REC. circuito,y ya esta listo,que te va a localizar oro y plata a distancia,y automatico.
Morgan
08-23-2011, 12:10 AM
We eagerly await the video. :hat
Oh yes,and then of course,the SKEPTICS avaluation :D
No problem at all...
Morgan
08-23-2011, 12:21 AM
With no doubs you have done a try an error project that finally got his reward.
I m not an electronic engenieer too, but i will keep invetigating and working on this matter, so i hope i can achive in the future success like you have done.
I will also like to know how do you test PDK? I mean if you have a test bed for testing sensibility of PDK and made some mods.? Can you detect fresh gols and silver?
Congratulations and i will PM later after work.
Best regards
Nelson
Hello Nelson
The PDK can locate fresh gold in air test.
After so long time working in this project(competition with Geo and Andreas,the winers)i stay in 3rd position with this LRL,better than PD,but insignificant if we compare to Geo´s PD(who can locate fresh gold at distance).
I not go to release the my project here,but i give the KEY,you and the others(who believe) must investigate the Passive Receiver project,you can find this in esteban´s thread,this is what i have done.
My sucess is becouse i have many silver and gold objects buried LONG TIME AGO,and make the perfect TEST for LRL´s.
Regards
Morgan
08-23-2011, 12:23 AM
Hello Nelson
The PDK can locate fresh gold in air test.
After so long time working in this project(competition with Geo and Andreas,the winers)i stay in 3rd position with this LRL,better than PD,but insignificant if we compare to Geo´s PD(who can locate fresh gold at distance).
I not go to release the my project here,but i give the KEY,you and the others(who believe) must investigate the Passive Receiver project,you can find this in esteban´s thread,this is what i have done.
My sucess is becouse i have many silver and gold objects buried LONG TIME AGO,and make the perfect TEST for LRL´s.
Regards
Correction:
The PDK can not locate fresh gold in air test. Yes,if the gold as more than 1 year underground(better lop or ring ).
Morgan
08-23-2011, 12:30 AM
Hi Morgan.
Tell me, what material is the box you are using to place the circuit. Yours looks like a plastic box.
Best regards
Nelson
Well,i have built one nice wood box,MINEORO style,but after insert there the PDK circuits,the device lose the ability to find the PHENOMENA,then it retuns again to the ugly plastic box. I´m investigating what happens,i supose its becouse the 2X9V batteries proximity to the RX coil...
Well,i have built one nice wood box,MINEORO style,but after insert there the PDK circuits,the device lose the ability to find the PHENOMENA,then it retuns again to the ugly plastic box. I´m investigating what happens,i supose its becouse the 2X9V batteries proximity to the RX coil...
Simply: "wood is not good" for VF devices. Wood act as load to VF circuitry.
Experiment: put the same (by weight) pieces of wood and plastic in microwave oven an heat it for 2 min. Most plastic came out only lukewarm, but wood come out very hot.
aft_72005
08-23-2011, 05:39 AM
ya nadamas nos falta hermanito aft72005 que la ponga a funcionar
may be soon brodhy aft72005 too put these stuff to work
Hi detectoman http://www.iranmicro.ir/forum/images/smilies/hi.gif
How are you big brother ? I hope your health is ok
Translation by google
"and brother, we need only offer aft72005 that make operational
May be too soon brodhy aft72005 stuff to put These work"
Thanking for your wishes , but need I say here , my second clone of Morgan black PD
, working correct at lab now. Must be trying and test at historical place !!!!!
For some problems in my countryhttp://www.itc3.com/images/smilies/itech%20(123).gif, I couldn’t test it yethttp://www.itc3.com/images/smilies/itech%20(102).gifhttp://www.itc3.com/images/smilies/swoon.gif, but I am very sure ,
It is work correct . other thing , the person( my dear friend ) help me in the matter http://www.iranmicro.ir/forum/images/smilies/Laie_99.gif, I am very
Thanking from him http://www.itc3.com/images/smilies/give_rose.gifhttp://www.itc3.com/images/smilies/give_rose.gif. also I am thanks from Morgan , he brought black PD to geotech http://www.itc3.com/images/smilies/53.gif.
Best regards.
aft_72005
08-23-2011, 05:45 AM
My PDK
16324
16325
Thank you Morgan , but strange head box is plastic!!!!!!
nelson
08-23-2011, 12:02 PM
Hi Morgan and thanks for your information.
The two 9 volts batteries may detune your antena, because of the amount of metal that is close to the antenna. So try to place the batteries has far has you can from the antennas.
Yesterday i didn´t have the time to PM, so i will try later today.
Best regards and keep doing experiments with PDK.
Nelson
Well,i have built one nice wood box,MINEORO style,but after insert there the PDK circuits,the device lose the ability to find the PHENOMENA,then it retuns again to the ugly plastic box. I´m investigating what happens,i supose its becouse the 2X9V batteries proximity to the RX coil...
Morgan
08-23-2011, 11:44 PM
Thank you Morgan , but strange head box is plastic!!!!!!
The coil shell is plastic,but if you pay atention,the covering where i draw the "M" is made of paper ;) but plastic works fine also.
So,you aready find iron nails 4m distance with your LRL,you are very near to have sucess and reject the iron. Good luck my friend.
Morgan
08-23-2011, 11:49 PM
The coil shell is plastic,but if you pay atention,the covering where i draw the "M" is made of paper ;) but plastic works fine also.
So,you aready find iron nails 4m distance with your LRL,you are very near to have sucess and reject the iron. Good luck my friend.
One clue for you
See one thread by Esteban where he is talking about one old LRL made by him,but with problems,he catch pieces of iron from fences very far away,he explain how to solve the problem.
I will try to find this thread.
LRLMAN
08-24-2011, 02:37 AM
Hi my friend Morgan congratulation for your great job I am follow your steps in zahori forum with ZB which I constructed and even without knowing anything about electronics which in a few days I send photos to the forum and I'm very interested in this new project called PDK
Many greetings and a big hug
Mario
aft_72005
08-24-2011, 01:10 PM
One clue for you
See one thread by Esteban where he is talking about one old LRL made by him,but with problems,he catch pieces of iron from fences very far away,he explain how to solve the problem.
I will try to find this thread.
Couldn't remember where it is???? http://www.itc3.com/images/smilies/K%20(5).gif http://www.itc3.com/images/smilies/yahoo/39d.gifhttp://www.itc3.com/images/smilies/K%20(10).gifCan you find this subject ?
nelson
08-25-2011, 01:23 PM
Hi Morgan
About the clue, may be one of them, is around frequency tunning, like this post by Esteban?
"If you put effort in it, you can. As Randy said, a good coil is necessary. Also adjust the resonance the max. possible, at pF range. I use off-resonance type. I use capacitance box and adjust the pF range with trimmer. "
www.geotech1.com/forums/showthread.php?t=13204&page=3
I bealive that first you must ume on the correct frequency and then work on sensitivity.
Regards
Nelson
One clue for you
See one thread by Esteban where he is talking about one old LRL made by him,but with problems,he catch pieces of iron from fences very far away,he explain how to solve the problem.
I will try to find this thread.
Morgan
08-25-2011, 01:50 PM
Hi Morgan
About the clue, may be one of them, is around frequency tunning, like this post by Esteban?
"If you put effort in it, you can. As Randy said, a good coil is necessary. Also adjust the resonance the max. possible, at pF range. I use off-resonance type. I use capacitance box and adjust the pF range with trimmer. "
www.geotech1.com/forums/showthread.php?t=13204&page=3
I bealive that first you must ume on the correct frequency and then work on sensitivity.
Regards
Nelson
yes Nelson,you are right,i try many coils and the ceramics pF until the PDK start locating smaller targets. I have the advantage to heve my field test with gold buried long time ago,but for you and the others how is possible to do this ???
Anyway the project presented by Esteban and Aft_ is already enough to find large objects,believe me.
Morgan
08-25-2011, 01:55 PM
Hi Morgan
About the clue, may be one of them, is around frequency tunning, like this post by Esteban?
"If you put effort in it, you can. As Randy said, a good coil is necessary. Also adjust the resonance the max. possible, at pF range. I use off-resonance type. I use capacitance box and adjust the pF range with trimmer. "
www.geotech1.com/forums/showthread.php?t=13204&page=3
I bealive that first you must ume on the correct frequency and then work on sensitivity.
Regards
Nelson
There is one PDK calibration where i can locate one large gold coin in air test,20 m,and 1,5V spark 1,40m,and everybody can do this,dont be lazy,regards.
Morgan
08-25-2011, 01:56 PM
There is one PDK calibration where i can locate one large gold coin in air test,20 m,and 1,5V spark 1,40m,and everybody can do this,dont be lazy,regards.
sorry,large gold coin 20 cm from the RX coil,not 20m.
nelson
08-25-2011, 02:07 PM
Thanks Morgan.
Now i began to understand this. My proyect is underconstruction, but when i finish my pcb that i send you, i found that it has a few errors, son now i m trying to fix this before i start to make the antenna and then my first test.
I also found this link that sales a VLF receiver that goes from 200 to 11000 hz and i don´t know if this could work to experiment on long range detectors too. This is just curiosity, cause now i m focusing on building a PDK.
http://www.auroralchorus.com/wr3.htm
Regards
Nelson
yes Nelson,you are right,i try many coils and the ceramics pF until the PDK start locating smaller targets. I have the advantage to heve my field test with gold buried long time ago,but for you and the others how is possible to do this ???
Anyway the project presented by Esteban and Aft_ is already enough to find large objects,believe me.
Morgan
08-25-2011, 02:34 PM
Thanks Morgan.
Now i began to understand this. My proyect is underconstruction, but when i finish my pcb that i send you, i found that it has a few errors, son now i m trying to fix this before i start to make the antenna and then my first test.
I also found this link that sales a VLF receiver that goes from 200 to 11000 hz and i don´t know if this could work to experiment on long range detectors too. This is just curiosity, cause now i m focusing on building a PDK.
http://www.auroralchorus.com/wr3.htm
Regards
Nelson
there are a few errors in your PCB,i saw two IC´s,but should be only one,when corrections made,send me again to analize.
This VLF receiver is maybe good,i dont know,i´m so happy with PDK that completly lose interest in other projects .
Morgan
08-25-2011, 02:43 PM
there are a few errors in your PCB,i saw two IC´s,but should be only one,when corrections made,send me again to analize.
This VLF receiver is maybe good,i dont know,i´m so happy with PDK that completly lose interest in other projects .
finaly no need this dificult calibrations in the limit i done before with Alonso´s Pistoldetektor, the PDK works fine even in low sensitivity.
It make the batteries empty in 5 hours of searching.
nelson
08-25-2011, 04:46 PM
HI Morgan.
Yes you are correct, my pcb has lots of errors, so i started to build it again a new pcb, that i hope to finish this weekend. Indeed i will also modeling the circuit with Multisim and after that i will draw a new pcb.
I m happy you got PDK to work, so now i wich luck finding a new treasure.
Regards
Nelson
there are a few errors in your PCB,i saw two IC´s,but should be only one,when corrections made,send me again to analize.
This VLF receiver is maybe good,i dont know,i´m so happy with PDK that completly lose interest in other projects .
nelson
08-25-2011, 04:49 PM
Wow, it has a big battery drain, but i think it doesn´t maters.
finaly no need this dificult calibrations in the limit i done before with Alonso´s Pistoldetektor, the PDK works fine even in low sensitivity.
It make the batteries empty in 5 hours of searching.
Qiaozhi
08-25-2011, 08:28 PM
Oh yes,and then of course,the SKEPTICS avaluation :D
No problem at all...
When you recovered the small (shoe) treasure, did you only use your PDK? Or was the final recovery performed with a metal detector?
Morgan
08-26-2011, 12:52 AM
When you recovered the small (shoe) treasure, did you only use your PDK? Or was the final recovery performed with a metal detector?
I locate the place with PDK,i pinpoint with PDK,i use the metal detector in this spot to confirm,but no signals,i dig 35cm and found the small object.
Morgan
08-26-2011, 12:54 AM
When you recovered the small (shoe) treasure, did you only use your PDK? Or was the final recovery performed with a metal detector?
One good metal detector or pinpointer is allways useful.
Alexismex
08-26-2011, 01:48 AM
I locate the place with PDK,i pinpoint with PDK,i use the metal detector in this spot to confirm,but no signals,i dig 35cm and found the small object.
If i understand well you use your metal detector to the pinpoint detected by the PDK and detect nothing at all , you just detect the "shoes" with the PDK ....i am right???
Alexismex
08-26-2011, 01:56 AM
At this distance your detection of the "shoes" is exceptional !!!!!! a true phenomena:):):)
I did not know if i am crazy but , i think that the reaction in the forum is very poor !!!!! nobody seem to believe this detection .....o.... nobody is conscious of the reach of this equipment "PDK" .....
regards
alexis
Qiaozhi
08-26-2011, 11:30 AM
At this distance your detection of the "shoes" is exceptional !!!!!! a true phenomena:):):)
I did not know if i am crazy but , i think that the reaction in the forum is very poor !!!!! nobody seem to believe this detection .....o.... nobody is conscious of the reach of this equipment "PDK" .....
regards
alexis
I think you have to consider the following:
1. A PI detector reacts to the decaying eddy current signal from the target.
2. A VLF detector reacts to the imbalance between the TX and RX coils caused by the target.
3. A BFO detector reacts to a change in inductance due to the presence of the target.
BUT ... what is the PDK reacting to? Until you can answer that question, without invoking pseudo-science, then the forum's response will probably continue to be poor. At the moment there is only circumstantial and subjective "proof" that the PDK does what is claimed. This is why I asked the question about whether a metal detector was used or not. Otherwise you only "hear" half the story. So far, we have not heard anything regarding the number of empty holes that have been dug. This is what I refer to as "selective memory".
FrancoItaly
08-26-2011, 11:33 AM
Hi Alexismex
You are right but it's difficult to believe in the lrl phenomenon if you have not a working lrl, you must believe in the words of not know persons and this is not easy. As Esteban said you have to experiment by yourself, I suggest to you to realize the Alonzo PD, to try some position of ferrite coil and to use some silver coins buried as target. After one week you can have a "good" phenomenon or you can made a ground battery, a piece of copper and a aluminum rod buried at about 50 cm.
Naturally I belong to the category of "lrl enthusiastic".
Best Regards
nobody seem to believe this detection .....o.... nobody is conscious of the reach of this equipment "PDK" .....
Probably answer was given by Morgan himself. Here citation Morgans claim about the same "PDK" from another thread:
"..... to prove scientificaly i cant, maybe others will do this in the future. "
And: we all are "lrl enthusiastic", but we all are not at same time "LRL blind believer". Things have to be demonstrated according valid and proven scientific method. Nothing from "blind" world cannot be taken as evidence that phenomenon really exist.
nelson
08-26-2011, 01:37 PM
Hi Qiaozhi
Excuseme, but for me this is like receiving at some distance the energy that comes from power lines.
PDK, detects some energy that are build by the metals that are mixed for long time with chemicals from the ground, that forms some kind of battery, then this energy is expose to the air. Of course this energy, that in this case are from silver and gold, arrives to your PDK at some frequency that is tuned by the device.
In other words for me at least, is like a radio receiver that tune a radio station.
Morgan, you have done a fantastic job and i m trying to figure out how happy you are about your PDK succsess
Regards
Nelson
I think you have to consider the following:
1. A PI detector reacts to the decaying eddy current signal from the target.
2. A VLF detector reacts to the imbalance between the TX and RX coils caused by the target.
3. A BFO detector reacts to a change in inductance due to the presence of the target.
BUT ... what is the PDK reacting to? Until you can answer that question, without invoking pseudo-science, then the forum's response will probably continue to be poor. At the moment there is only circumstantial and subjective "proof" that the PDK does what is claimed. This is why I asked the question about whether a metal detector was used or not. Otherwise you only "hear" half the story. So far, we have not heard anything regarding the number of empty holes that have been dug. This is what I refer to as "selective memory".
Qiaozhi
08-26-2011, 02:14 PM
Hi Qiaozhi
Excuseme, but for me this is like receiving at some distance the energy that comes from power lines.
PDK, detects some energy that are build by the metals that are mixed for long time with chemicals from the ground, that forms some kind of battery, then this energy is expose to the air. Of course this energy, that in this case are from silver and gold, arrives to your PDK at some frequency that is tuned by the device.
In other words for me at least, is like a radio receiver that tune a radio station.
Morgan, you have done a fantastic job and i m trying to figure out how happy you are about your PDK succsess
Regards
Nelson
OK - that is a theory ... but there is no evidence to suggest that such a phenomenon exists. If it does exist, then you should be able to measure it using conventional equipment. At the present time no-one has done this, which tends to suggest that the theory is wrong.
nelson
08-26-2011, 02:25 PM
Well, i respect your point of view, but for shure we must wait for a real test and video too.
The other way is to construct one device and try some test by your self.
Indeed, i m working on one device to see by my eyes how it performs.
My first try was mini zahori, that got signals from a few places and one of them allow me to recover a metal, the others came from places that were not permited to dig.
In conclusion, this let me know that there are some things that need to be experimented, while loosing to much time looking by theory.
May be is thru that teory for this is understandable, but if we don´t give a try and try to this, will never understand if PDK or PD works or does not work.
Regards
Nelson
OK - that is a theory ... but there is no evidence to suggest that such a phenomenon exists. If it does exist, then you should be able to measure it using conventional equipment. At the present time no-one has done this, which tends to suggest that the theory is wrong.
PDK, detects some energy that are build by the metals that are mixed for long time with chemicals from the ground, that forms some kind of battery, then this energy is expose to the air.
If we accept this explanation, then all sort of battery can expose his detectable energy to the air.
Furthermore in this way PDK have to be able to detect all sort of batteries by detecting its to the air exposed energy. Can it? There are very simple test if you are interested.
No, sorry, you cant. Why not? Because all energy processes taking place inside the battery itself and not through the air. And those energy processes inside the battery are purely galvanic (direct current processes) and not oscillating processes capable to sent something like RF frequencies in the air.
Yes, there are many battery like processes in the soil that are constantly arise and are promoted by pollution, acid rain, etc.. But all those very weak processes are energetically closed circle in soil only, which disappears by time without measurable effect in surrounded air.
Morgan
08-26-2011, 03:50 PM
At this distance your detection of the "shoes" is exceptional !!!!!! a true phenomena:):):)
I did not know if i am crazy but , i think that the reaction in the forum is very poor !!!!! nobody seem to believe this detection .....o.... nobody is conscious of the reach of this equipment "PDK" .....
regards
alexis
But Geo build better than my PDK,see the threads,he claim to detect one modern gold coin over the ground, up to 5 meters,see his videos,gold coin near the olive tree,amazing.
Morgan
08-26-2011, 04:08 PM
OK - that is a theory ... but there is no evidence to suggest that such a phenomenon exists. If it does exist, then you should be able to measure it using conventional equipment. At the present time no-one has done this, which tends to suggest that the theory is wrong.
Hi Qiaozhi
If you have a look into the Alonso´s Passive Receiver + Beeper circuit (the PDK project) you get your point of view,becouse you are electronic engineer and know limits about electronics.
As to me,i understand very little about electronics and i tried many things in this circuit.One of them,i put the Receptor so sensitive ,it can detect one gold coin 20 cm near the coil,and one 1,5V spark 1,40m distance,but it was not this configuration who aloud the PDK to be very sensitive to the Phenomena of litlle objects buried long time ago,it was another modification i have made.
Morgan
08-26-2011, 04:15 PM
Hi Alexismex
You are right but it's difficult to believe in the lrl phenomenon if you have not a working lrl, you must believe in the words of not know persons and this is not easy. As Esteban said you have to experiment by yourself, I suggest to you to realize the Alonzo PD, to try some position of ferrite coil and to use some silver coins buried as target. After one week you can have a "good" phenomenon or you can made a ground battery, a piece of copper and a aluminum rod buried at about 50 cm.
Naturally I belong to the category of "lrl enthusiastic".
Best Regards
Hello Franco
Why people go to buried copper,or aluminium? I already buried a few gold objects,and alot of silver,even a small treasure of 20 silver coins(not rare) mixed with salt. I see in all the people (even Esteban,who buried copper coins mixed with salt+vinegar) afraid to buried precious metals,but in fact it will worth becouse,we are making LRL´s and need to calibrate them to find gold&silver.
Regards
LRLMAN
08-26-2011, 04:21 PM
Sorry my dear Alexis if I am aware of this equipment, you do not share that opinion, I have personally seen this technology work with great success and I believe in everything they say in this forum have built a LRL of these and be finding objects valuable as Morgan's friends, Stephen, Geo and other guys from this forum just this type of technology is very advanced for our conventional wisdom of all the things we're used to seeing.
Greetings and a hug.
LRLMAN
Qiaozhi
08-26-2011, 04:35 PM
... just this type of technology is very advanced for our conventional wisdom of all the things we're used to seeing.
:lol: Sorry ... but that is the usual excuse when someone is unable to support their pet theory with hard real-world evidence. Of course it is not so advanced that we cannot understand it using conventional science and engineering - if it is a real phenomenon, that is. Otherwise, the so-called "successful results" have to be attributed to a combination of self deception, wishful thinking and selective memory.
At the end of the day, I think we all agree that it would be wonderful if such a device as the PDK could detect treasure several meters in the distance. This would allow searching of vast areas very quickly. However, the hard evidence is still very elusive, and I remain to be convinced. The anecdotal and subjective evidence presented so far just doesn't constitute proof.
FrancoItaly
08-26-2011, 04:43 PM
Hi Morgan
My suggestion for Alexismex is only a easy way to test the phenomenon and not to discriminate for gold, this is the next steep...
Best Regards
Morgan
08-26-2011, 04:49 PM
:lol: Sorry ... but that is the usual excuse when someone is unable to support their pet theory with hard real-world evidence. Of course it is not so advanced that we cannot understand it using conventional science and engineering - if it is a real phenomenon, that is. Otherwise, the so-called "successful results" have to be attributed to a combination of self deception, wishful thinking and selective memory.
At the end of the day, I think we all agree that it would be wonderful if such a device as the PDK could detect treasure several meters in the distance. This would allow searching of vast areas very quickly. However, the hard evidence is still very elusive, and I remain to be convinced. The anecdotal and subjective evidence presented so far just doesn't constitute proof.
You will have the proof.
What will be you behavior with others if you make the perfect LRL? Will you share your hard work with others?Is it posible to select who deserv or not ?
I will give here the PDK in first stage,enough to find big treasures several meters distance,i think i´m better,not so bad .
The LRL technology is noting more complicated than old BFO´s or radios,but with the correct balance for resonating will make the TH´s dream.
16365
nelson
08-26-2011, 04:57 PM
Hi WM6
Ok i understand your explanation, but tell me what is the diference when you detect the energy from power lines, lets said 110 VAC, 60 HZ?
I know this is AC currents, not DC current, but i m just curius about it. I m not an engenier in electronics.
Regards
Nelson
If we accept this explanation, then all sort of battery can expose his detectable energy to the air.
Furthermore in this way PDK have to be able to detect all sort of batteries by detecting its to the air exposed energy. Can it? There are very simple test if you are interested.
No, sorry, you cant. Why not? Because all energy processes taking place inside the battery itself and not through the air. And those energy processes inside the battery are purely galvanic (direct current processes) and not oscillating processes capable to sent something like RF frequencies in the air.
Yes, there are many battery like processes in the soil that are constantly arise and are promoted by pollution, acid rain, etc.. But all those very weak processes are energetically closed circle in soil only, which disappears by time without measurable effect in surrounded air.
Qiaozhi
08-26-2011, 09:10 PM
You will have the proof.
What will be you behavior with others if you make the perfect LRL? Will you share your hard work with others?Is it posible to select who deserv or not ?
I will give here the PDK in first stage,enough to find big treasures several meters distance,i think i´m better,not so bad .
The LRL technology is noting more complicated than old BFO´s or radios,but with the correct balance for resonating will make the TH´s dream.
16365
If I had a working [perfect] LRL, then I would post the details here. :friends
None of the existing commercial electronic LRLs are big sellers. Which is why they have a very high price tag, and a disappointed user base. The LRL gizmos that are not expensive, are the ones based on dowsing, and contain some electronics that doesn't actually do anything useful. :thumb
You might as well post the full details for FREE, as most people are not going to believe that it works anyway. :disagree
LRLs (like the PDK) are designed by amateurs interested in the subject. Even if someone decides to rip off the design and make it commercial, how much profit will they really make? The design will already be in the public domain, and no-one is going to pay a high price for something they can build themselves for free. :good
Morgan
08-28-2011, 03:27 AM
At this distance your detection of the "shoes" is exceptional !!!!!! a true phenomena:):):)
I did not know if i am crazy but , i think that the reaction in the forum is very poor !!!!! nobody seem to believe this detection .....o.... nobody is conscious of the reach of this equipment "PDK" .....
regards
alexis
Hi Alexis
This is normal,everybody think i lie or exagerate in my LRL experiments. And i say more,when you hear people telling they have one LRL able to find silver ring 700meters, i say is not possible,this thing as limits in the range of several meters for the small objects,otherwise it will be impossible to control in the field the PDK or other LRL.
Morgan
08-28-2011, 03:34 AM
If I had a working [perfect] LRL, then I would post the details here. :friends
None of the existing commercial electronic LRLs are big sellers. Which is why they have a very high price tag, and a disappointed user base. The LRL gizmos that are not expensive, are the ones based on dowsing, and contain some electronics that doesn't actually do anything useful. :thumb
You might as well post the full details for FREE, as most people are not going to believe that it works anyway. :disagree
LRLs (like the PDK) are designed by amateurs interested in the subject. Even if someone decides to rip off the design and make it commercial, how much profit will they really make? The design will already be in the public domain, and no-one is going to pay a high price for something they can build themselves for free. :good
Well,well...
So you are very kind with people here.
:hat:hat:hat
Hi.
I believe Morgan about his PDK.
When i was to Portugal for the PD tests i had with me a simple LRL. I believe it was about the same with the Morgan's PDK and it passed successfully from the gold mental test. I don't know about Morgan's modifications but my PD was the Alonsos's passive receiver with a coil stimulator. The frequency of stimulator was 60Khz and the frequency of passive receiver was 60Khz ....255Khz. Also i had another pcb but i believe that it works the same good and without it, as it is the PDK.
Regards
Hello Franco
Why people go to buried copper,or aluminium? I already buried a few gold objects,and alot of silver,even a small treasure of 20 silver coins(not rare) mixed with salt. I see in all the people (even Esteban,who buried copper coins mixed with salt+vinegar) afraid to buried precious metals,but in fact it will worth becouse,we are making LRL´s and need to calibrate them to find gold&silver.
Regards
Dear Morgan, you are brave enthusiastic.
But problem with your tests is as we always pointed, that you know where buried targets are.
If you know where buried target is, than it is easy to find it even with simple wooden dowsing rod.
In case that you do not know where buried target is, your PDK will fail, except if it works as MD or one of known technical solution.
Easy to prove if you agree to undergone real test.
Hi Alexis
This is normal,everybody think i lie or exagerate in my LRL experiments. And i say more,when you hear people telling they have one LRL able to find silver ring 700meters, i say is not possible,this thing as limits in the range of several meters for the small objects,otherwise it will be impossible to control in the field the PDK or other LRL.
Hi Morgan
I don't think that you lie.
But if you detect something at say 3m distance in air, can we still talk about LRL?
It is relative easy to build device that can detect metal at couple meters distance in air. We can detect air targets even with our eyes.
But all those devices fail even shallow detection in soil. All such devices, inclusive "Alonso PD" and its derivative.
Hi.
I believe Morgan about his PDK.
When i was to Portugal for the PD tests i had with me a simple LRL. I believe it was about the same with the Morgan's PDK and it passed successfully from the gold mental test. I don't know about Morgan's modifications but my PD was the Alonsos's passive receiver with a coil stimulator. The frequency of stimulator was 60Khz and the frequency of passive receiver was 60Khz ....255Khz. Also i had another pcb but i believe that it works the same good and without it, as it is the PDK.
Regards
Dear Geo, sorry for a little play with your words, this is for my friend Funfider which do not know what religiuos question is.
I know Geo, that you believe, because you are LRL beliver.
But outside of our beliefs Alonso passive receiver cannot work as LRL even with seven (7) coil stimulators.
Easy to prove in real test.
Dear Geo, sorry for a little play with your words, this is for my friend Funfider which do not know what religiuos question is.
I know Geo, that you believe, because you are LRL beliver.
But outside of our beliefs Alonso passive receiver cannot work as LRL even with seven (7) coil stimulators.
Easy to prove in real test.
Hi WM6.
Yes, with 7 stimulators it is difficult to work but with one (1) Yes.
Regards:)
Hi Morgan
I don't think that you lie.
But if you detect something at say 3m distance in air, can we still talk about LRL?
It is relative easy to build device that can detect metal at couple meters distance in air. We can detect air targets even with our eyes.
But all those devices fail even shallow detection in soil. All such devices, inclusive "Alonso PD" and its derivative.
If we detect a coin from 3 or 5 m far and 30cm deep in the earth then who is your opinion???? Are we speak for LRL or not????
Regards:)
Barbarossa
08-28-2011, 11:48 AM
this not a lrl.this is mrl. midl range locator
If we detect a coin from 3 or 5 m far and 30cm deep in the earth then who is your opinion???? Are we speak for LRL or not????
Regards:)
For me, Geo, such device can be treated as real remote detector, but first have to be proven that it really detect something in soil on such distance. Proven, that it is not only about self-deceptions, including known target, as always.
mikebg
08-28-2011, 03:45 PM
For me, Geo, such device can be treated as real remote detector, but first have to be proven that it really detect something in soil on such distance. Proven, that it is not only about self-deceptions, including known target, as always.
The results should be published here:
http://www.jir.com/
Morgan
08-28-2011, 08:38 PM
For me, Geo, such device can be treated as real remote detector, but first have to be proven that it really detect something in soil on such distance. Proven, that it is not only about self-deceptions, including known target, as always.
So i have only Midle Range Locators...
The LRL films are made with already known targets ,to save film time(less MGB´s) otherwise it will be very heavy film to email,10MGB is the limit.
So i have only Midle Range Locators...
The LRL films are made with already known targets ,to save film time(less MGB´s) otherwise it will be very heavy film to email,10MGB is the limit.
If working, middle range is far enough.
Waiting on film, hope there is experienced screenwriter behind.
Alexismex
08-29-2011, 02:31 AM
For everyone..... in all the forum of metal detectors enthusiast
DETECTION of this small item in Silver o Gold (shoe) at one meter (i did not say two o four meters) and 30 cm deep is exceptional,
I will buy it in the instant........:)
Morgan
08-29-2011, 02:41 AM
OK - that is a theory ... but there is no evidence to suggest that such a phenomenon exists. If it does exist, then you should be able to measure it using conventional equipment. At the present time no-one has done this, which tends to suggest that the theory is wrong.
Hello
I made a few PDK videos,the problem is the smaller with 40 MGB´s...
Imagine a full movie with searching,locating the target and digging the object...200 MGB´s
? This digital camera not mine,and cant make films less than this resolution.
For everyone..... in all the forum of metal detectors enthusiast
DETECTION of this small item in Silver o Gold (shoe) at one meter (i did not say two o four meters) and 30 cm deep is exceptional,
I will buy it in the instant........:)
Hi Alexis.
Nobody sell a workable LRL. I don't know if Alonso can sell one to you.
Regards:)
Qiaozhi
08-29-2011, 11:40 AM
Hello
I made a few PDK videos,the problem is the smaller with 40 MGB´s...
Imagine a full movie with searching,locating the target and digging the object...200 MGB´s
? This digital camera not mine,and cant make films less than this resolution.
There are many freeware programs available that can convert video files from one format to another. They also allow you to reduce the resolution to achieve a smaller file size.
Morgan
08-29-2011, 09:11 PM
There are many freeware programs available that can convert video files from one format to another. They also allow you to reduce the resolution to achieve a smaller file size.
i will try that.
detectoman
08-30-2011, 03:15 PM
hello morgan, alexismex sell m.d he personal project in mexico, he named topo p.i, he be the builder, these pi brious can detect deep he say, price is hig
may be alexismex look too the pd´s cloning
hola morgan alexismex es el vendedor en mexico, de su proyecto topo, que es un pulse induction, nos lo vende muy caro
Hello
I made a few PDK videos,the problem is the smaller with 40 MGB´s...
Imagine a full movie with searching,locating the target and digging the object...200 MGB´s
? This digital camera not mine,and cant make films less than this resolution.
I have some experience in video editing if you need, and i can convert the edited video to any size.
I could even blurr faces or add some special effect :razz:
Morgan
08-30-2011, 11:17 PM
hello morgan, alexismex sell m.d he personal project in mexico, he named topo p.i, he be the builder, these pi brious can detect deep he say, price is hig
may be alexismex look too the pd´s cloning
hola morgan alexismex es el vendedor en mexico, de su proyecto topo, que es un pulse induction, nos lo vende muy caro
Gracias por la informacion
Alexismex
08-31-2011, 01:23 AM
Hello Morgan , see this post
http://www.geotech1.com/forums/showthread.php?p=133383#post133383
, here i am with the Topo and minilogger in action :)
For me, Geo, such device can be treated as real remote detector, but first have to be proven that it really detect something in soil on such distance. Proven, that it is not only about self-deceptions, including known target, as always.
I agree with you.
The Big mistake with lrls is that most users wants from a lrl to have the same behavior as a normal MD. From what i saw, when i accept a lrl that it works, i must accept and some problem that it has.
I agree with you.
The Big mistake with lrls is that most users wants from a lrl to have the same behavior as a normal MD. From what i saw, when i accept a lrl that it works, i must accept and some problem that it has.
Hi Geo,
Maybe one problem is that we never know what is being detected ?
Morgan
09-01-2011, 12:27 AM
Hello Morgan , see this post
http://www.geotech1.com/forums/showthread.php?p=133383#post133383
, here i am with the Topo and minilogger in action :)
This aparatus looks complicated to use in rough ground.Now i understand why you interested in LRL´s ;-)
Alexismex
09-01-2011, 02:08 AM
It is not complicated..... it is like Pulse detector .... but is effective and tell you where is the metal .... also it is for that i am interested Iffffffffff this Pdk detect a small shoes at 35 cm deep and one meter distant ...........
you are very very rich now!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Hi Geo,
Maybe one problem is that we never know what is being detected ?
Hi Fred.
Only with often digging we will learn a lrl.
There are lrls that detect objects from very far but have problem near to object, and there are lrls (as Alonsos PD) that have not the ability for far detecting but "goes" very close to the object. So we must know what we have at our hands.
Regards:)
Morgan
09-01-2011, 11:49 PM
It is not complicated..... it is like Pulse detector .... but is effective and tell you where is the metal .... also it is for that i am interested Iffffffffff this Pdk detect a small shoes at 35 cm deep and one meter distant ...........
you are very very rich now!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
You will see the movie,how PDK is working
Morgan
09-01-2011, 11:51 PM
Hi Fred.
Only with often digging we will learn a lrl.
There are lrls that detect objects from very far but have problem near to object, and there are lrls (as Alonsos PD) that have not the ability for far detecting but "goes" very close to the object. So we must know what we have at our hands.
Regards:)
Thats correct,and sometimes the signal seems to stay above the target,and when aproach the LRL to ground for pinpointing,it vanish...
Morgan
09-01-2011, 11:55 PM
I have some experience in video editing if you need, and i can convert the edited video to any size.
I could even blurr faces or add some special effect :razz:
Hi Fred
Even with program for MB reduction,the less i have in film is 23MGB...need to buy one digital camera with optional lower image resulution...
Do you have mail box enough for this MGB´s ?
Qiaozhi
09-02-2011, 12:39 AM
Hi Fred
Even with program for MB reduction,the less i have in film is 23MGB...need to buy one digital camera with optional lower image resulution...
Do you have mail box enough for this MGB´s ?
You could try www.dropbox.com (http://www.dropbox.com) for sharing files. You start off with a 2GB limit, so you would have to shrink your video files. But at least the capacity is beyond the file size limit for email.
By the way I'm assuming you meant to say 23GB ... or should that have 23MB. If it's the latter, then there's no problem.
Alexismex
09-02-2011, 02:09 AM
Part one...two ....three......four....etc.....
We want to see the movie....:)
Hi Fred
Even with program for MB reduction,the less i have in film is 23MGB...need to buy one digital camera with optional lower image resulution...
Do you have mail box enough for this MGB´s ?
Hi Morgan,
I have a gmail account, i think it accepts large files, (assuming you mean Mb, not Gb) but as Qiaozhi says sharing files should not be a problem.You can even send a dvd, flash disk (pen) or HD and i will send it back.
But the idea for a reasonable quality is not really to record in low resolution, but to reencode it after editing, compacting for a correct size/quality.
Morgan
09-03-2011, 12:49 AM
Hi Morgan,
I have a gmail account, i think it accepts large files, (assuming you mean Mb, not Gb) but as Qiaozhi says sharing files should not be a problem.You can even send a dvd, flash disk (pen) or HD and i will send it back.
But the idea for a reasonable quality is not really to record in low resolution, but to reencode it after editing, compacting for a correct size/quality.
Its MB´s not GB´s
You can send me PM with email for the LRL films,maybe you can make them shorter ,less MB´s.
Its MB´s not GB´s
You can send me PM with email for the LRL films,maybe you can make them shorter ,less MB´s.
You can send it to Qiaozhi via Gmail (it support bigger files) and he will put it here. It is the method that i use:lol:
Regards
Morgan
09-03-2011, 02:42 PM
You can send it to Qiaozhi via Gmail (it support bigger files) and he will put it here. It is the method that i use:lol:
Regards
Ok,send to me his Gmail adress.
Thanks
Qiaozhi
09-03-2011, 03:35 PM
Ok,send to me his Gmail adress.
Thanks
Geo means that you need a gmail address.
My Geotech email can already handle large files.
LRLMAN
09-03-2011, 08:04 PM
hello Morgan if you can send me the videos or video, please my E-mail receive big videos will thank you much
marioph6@hotmail.com
regards
lrlman.
nelson
09-03-2011, 08:23 PM
Hi Morgan.
Has all friends here wants to help with the video, i also have a gmail account that can get your video. So if you want i can get you video and then try to upload it to youtube.com
My email is : nlepet@gmail.com
Regards
Nelson
Ok,send to me his Gmail adress.
Thanks
Astrodetect
09-04-2011, 09:13 PM
Paulo
Maybe it is easier if you upload the videos to youtube. I think you can do this.
Regards
Paulo
Maybe it is easier if you upload the videos to youtube. I think you can do this.
Regards
It is the best solution :)
Morgan
09-19-2011, 01:32 PM
Paulo
Maybe it is easier if you upload the videos to youtube. I think you can do this.
Regards
I have new digital camera,japanese FUJIFILM is good for LRL films.
I go to send for Qiahozi the films.
Made the films near silver bracelet buried two years ago (50cm deep) with salt.
See the HOT reaction when near the Electromagnetic field produced by the object underground . No fakes,all is TRUE here.
Later i will reduce size of the other LRL films,to also present here for the LRL entusiasts,and of course for the skeptics put their advanced critics,they can say bad things,but this is pure ELECTRONICS at work to serve the TH´s,no lies:nono:
Morgan
09-19-2011, 01:38 PM
I have new digital camera,japanese FUJIFILM is good for LRL films.
I go to send for Qiahozi the films.
Made the films near silver bracelet buried two years ago (50cm deep) with salt.
See the HOT reaction when near the Electromagnetic field produced by the object underground . No fakes,all is TRUE here.
Later i will reduce size of the other LRL films,to also present here for the LRL entusiasts,and of course for the skeptics put their advanced critics,they can say bad things,but this is pure ELECTRONICS at work to serve the TH´s,no lies:nono:
Other PDK,MINEORO style ;)
16692
16693
Morgan
09-19-2011, 09:46 PM
I have new digital camera,japanese FUJIFILM is good for LRL films.
I go to send for Qiahozi the films.
Made the films near silver bracelet buried two years ago (50cm deep) with salt.
See the HOT reaction when near the Electromagnetic field produced by the object underground . No fakes,all is TRUE here.
Later i will reduce size of the other LRL films,to also present here for the LRL entusiasts,and of course for the skeptics put their advanced critics,they can say bad things,but this is pure ELECTRONICS at work to serve the TH´s,no lies:nono:
Also sent the film with PD locate the same object, see the diference.
detectoman
09-20-2011, 01:46 AM
your camera may be good japanise, but youre very bad photograps, please no take videos in night
vBulletin® v3.8.11, Copyright ©2000-2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.