Ultrasonic hearing

[Mike(Mont)]

I've talked about the human skin being able to sense a wide range of frequencies, but this device can train the inner ear.

http://www.neurophone.com/home.htm

[Max]

I've talked about the human skin being able to sense a wide range of frequencies, but this device can train the inner ear.

http://www.neurophone.com/home.htm

Neuro-phone ???

Do you mean you're in a neuro-logy department and they let you use the phone ??? :lol:

I imagine the scene...

You calling Elvis in the middle of the night... asking him to send you as gift his flared pants... and the nurses there that laugh like crazy... :D

Kind regards,
Max

[Theseus]

Neuro-phone ???

Do you mean you're in a neuro-logy department and they let you use the phone ??? :lol:

I imagine the scene...

You calling Elvis in the middle of the night... asking him to send you as gift his flared pants... and the nurses there that laugh like crazy... :D

Kind regards,
Max

I can see your humor, Max; but probably Mike will not.

Mike searches out any and all topics (esoteric or not) and attempts to somehow draw analogies and/or links to the practice of dowsing. Apparently he does this in an attempt to bring some measure of credibility to the practice of dowsing.

So far he has been unsuccessful.

[Qiaozhi]

I've talked about the human skin being able to sense a wide range of frequencies, but this device can train the inner ear.

http://www.neurophone.com/home.htm
I thought the neurophone might actually be a serious relaxation aid, until I followed one of the links to this site -> http://www.phisciences.com/
Then I read about "crystal energy" and "wetter water".

Alarm bells!

Oh! Time to go .....

[Mike(Mont)]

If a scientist can't measure it, "It can't happen here."

[ron_o]

If you want to detect ultrasonic sounds and convert them to a frequency you can hear , see

A home-made ultrasonic power line arc detector by James T Hanson published in April 2006 issue of QST mag

or any bat sound converter.

I cannot understand how it would work or be modified to find buried metal

Regards

Ron_o

[J_Player]

If a scientist can't measure it, "It can't happen here."Hmmmm....
Maybe you're right. These people at Neurophone may know better than the scientists.
They are actually making a profit selling the Neurophone and accessories that range in price from $12.99 to $495 US.
What scientist can do that? huh?

It just goes to show that scientists don't know chit about living the good life through selling advanced scientific concepts to consumers.
But the folks at Neurophones do!
So you are absolutely correct. If a scientist can't measure it, "It can't happen here."
(of course, we here don't generally pay $495 for pseudoscience).

Best wishes,
J_P

[Mike(Mont)]

Martin Lenhardt (University of Virginia) got his work published in "Science". How many articles have you had published there?

The older version costs $250. I don't know if it works. I was curious how it would work for locating if you input a frequency generator signal.

[Theseus]

Martin Lenhardt (University of Virginia) got his work published in "Science". How many articles have you had published there?

The older version costs $250. I don't know if it works. I was curious how it would work for locating if you input a frequency generator signal.

Exactly the same as if you DID NOT input a frequency generator signal.

Positive results from injecting micro-powered frequencies to dowsing or anything else you can imagine is a trick of the mind. If you think otherwise, than you have been a victim of someone's mind control techniques (probably Dell Winders or Tim Williams) and you should come to your senses.

If you insist on remaining in the clutches of those mind-control specialists than I feel sorry for you.

The truth is out there, it is not hidden, seek it out, Mike.

[Mike(Mont)]

Well, I don't know what will happen and you don't, either. How many articles have you had published in "Science"?

[J_Player]

The older version costs $250. I don't know if it works. I was curious how it would work for locating if you input a frequency generator signal.Well, if we wanted to make some sense of this, then we must make some hypothetical assumptions that may or may not be true. But for the sake of argument, let's say we can build a signal generator that will broadcast a weak RF signal that will somehow bounce off only gold in the near field (say 10-20 feet distance). Let's also assume we can monitor the TX and RX signal with a number of receivers that have antennas on the detector body. Let's also assume that the RX signal is strong enough to be measurable when superimposed over the TX signal, and the signal is of a long enough wavelength to be a little longer than the spacing between the farthest two of the RX antennas on the detector.

If these conditions are met, then the principle described involves imaging based on the reflected signals being sensed on the RX antennas, or on external source signals arriving at the RX antennas. In the simplest form, we are able to locate the direction, and sometimes the distance of a sound we hear by allowing our brain to measure the time difference of a wavefront arriving at the two ears, and also listening for other attributes of the sound that we have been trained to interpret as meaning "distant" "near" "behind a wall" etc. But this deciphering and interpreting is not so simple. When applied to RF being received on several antennas, we can look at time of arrival, phase difference, and other information used in radio direction finding techniques. Then we could also import some kind of database to check a profile for gold, silver, bottle tops, etc. The hard part would be to develop algorithms to decipher the signature and imaging data of different items picked on the RX antenna matrix..

But the hardest part is none of this can work unless we can find a signal generator that will send back a receivable signal that can be measured and interpreted to indicate only when there is a buried treasure in the ground. I have never seen any such device. Thus this nice imaging technique could be very cool for things that are possible like acoustic waves and light waves imaging objects in front of us (even if a pair of eyeballs working in stereo could do a better job). But this imaging technique would be very un-cool for things that don't work, ie: RF to locate buried gold.

Best wishes.
J_P

[Max]

Well, I don't know what will happen and you don't, either. How many articles have you had published in "Science"?

And you ? How many !? :lol:

1000 ? :rolleyes:

10000 ? :shocked:

There's no need to publish stuff on "Science" to know what's c.r.a.p. and will not work!

But seems you don't understand that little concept... :D

Kind regards,
Max

[Theseus]

Well, I don't know what will happen and you don't, either. How many articles have you had published in "Science"?

You may not know what will happen, but I do.

I stand by my original statement posted above.

Incidently, there is ZERO correlation between the number of articles one has published and whether or not an evaluation of "wish science" is accurate or not. Check your facts before you make such erroneous comparisons, as it degrades your entire posting.

However, as Max pointed out to you; There's no need to publish stuff on "Science" to know what's c.r.a.p. and will not work!

[Mike(Mont)]

Blinded by skepticism. It appears to be some form of fear.

[Max]

Blinded by skepticism. It appears to be some form of fear.

:lol:

Fear of what ? Something that don't work ?

try another one... :razz:

Kind regards,
Max

[Theseus]

Blinded by skepticism. It appears to be some form of fear.

Wrong on both counts.

Just because you personally are lacking in common sense and basic logic, does not by default make everyone else not afflicted with your problem; blinded by skepticism. :nono:

[WM6]

Blinded by skepticism. It appears to be some form of fear.

Maybe. You have the opportunity to blinding us with scientific evidence.

[Mike(Mont)]

I plan to persue this further. One clue I caught is that dogs use this same process and if you recall, I have heard that dogs can detect an MFD signal line. So now I wonder how much this is used by some "gifted" (LOL) humans--those who can use an MFD. The neurophone says some people claim heightened awareness along with relaxation. Both are needed.

I have an old brainwave synchronizer that has an audio input. I can input a frequency generator signal to it and with a little work can run the whole system on a small battery in my backpack. I don't know how this compares with the Neurophone unit, but I suspect it is take-off from the neurophone.

[Max]

Nice... do it...

maybe you'll find Elvis this way...

Let me know if so... I need his sideburns! :lol:

[Mike(Mont)]

I have been using the brainwave synchronizer the last couple of days and for whatever reason I really got back my psychic electricity. So much my left hand almost hurt it was so strong. Not quite so strong today. Never got the FG hooked up yet.

[J_Player]

I have been using the brainwave synchronizer the last couple of days and for whatever reason I really got back my psychic electricity. So much my left hand almost hurt it was so strong. Not quite so strong today. Never got the FG hooked up yet.Hi Mike(Mont),
Now that you got back to your psychic electricity, and it is not quite as strong today, I presume your left hand is not almost hurting any more.
So your condition of returned psychic electricity has probably become more stable than when it first returned.

My question is this:
With your condition of having back your psychic electricity, how has the world changed around you?

By this, I mean to ask are you able to locate hidden objects better than when you don't have all your psychic electricity?
But also, I am wondering if other things look different in your viewpoint of the world with your additional psychic electricity, that maybe we have not been looking at.

Thanks in advance
J_P

[Mike(Mont)]

Yes, my locating works better. As I have said before, I don't rely completely on the rod movement, I like to feel the PE. I don't assume I have a good target unless I can feel it. When I sweep the rod past/through the target, or when I get on the signal line between the transmitter and the target, or when I get within a few feet of the target I get the PE. With the right practice, I can feel it over my whole body when near the target, but mostly in my left hand or not as much in my left arm. I can't say for certain the the BWS has caused this, but I went out to practice yesterday morning (hadn't used the BWS that day) and the PE was there big time. Haven't felt it that strong for months. I will say for certain I have more of a spacial awareness, but other than that I don't know what.

I don't know if I made this clear enough, but I have not been using the brainwave synchronizer while locating yet. I just use it inbetween times. The system I have has an eyeglasses frame with LED lights that flash in front of your closed eyes. The headphones have some white noise and some beat that changes frequency from time to time (along with the LED's). It feels like your brain is going through a washing machine cycle and the lights have a 3D effect that appears like you are looking down a tunnel (at times). There is like interference waves (light and dark areas and lines).

[Theseus]

The system I have has an eyeglasses frame with LED lights that flash in front of your closed eyes. The headphones have some white noise and some beat that changes frequency from time to time (along with the LED's). It feels like your brain is going through a washing machine cycle and the lights have a 3D effect that appears like you are looking down a tunnel (at times). There is like interference waves (light and dark areas and lines).

Wow! Spooky... sort of an induced trance of sorts. ....a little too spooky for this observer. ;)

If that's what dowsing has gotten to now, no wonder no one can do it.

Wonder what new innovation it will be next week after you read your next book?

[J_Player]

Yes, my locating works better. As I have said before, I don't rely completely on the rod movement, I like to feel the PE. I don't assume I have a good target unless I can feel it. When I sweep the rod past/through the target, or when I get on the signal line between the transmitter and the target, or when I get within a few feet of the target I get the PE. With the right practice, I can feel it over my whole body when near the target, but mostly in my left hand or not as much in my left arm. I can't say for certain the the BWS has caused this, but I went out to practice yesterday morning (hadn't used the BWS that day) and the PE was there big time. Haven't felt it that strong for months. I will say for certain I have more of a spacial awareness, but other than that I don't know what.

I don't know if I made this clear enough, but I have not been using the brainwave synchronizer while locating yet. I just use it inbetween times. The system I have has an eyeglasses frame with LED lights that flash in front of your closed eyes. The headphones have some white noise and some beat that changes frequency from time to time (along with the LED's). It feels like your brain is going through a washing machine cycle and the lights have a 3D effect that appears like you are looking down a tunnel (at times). There is like interference waves (light and dark areas and lines).Hi Mike,
Thank you for the interesting report. I can see how your regained psychic electricity has changed things for you. Strange how your right arm does not feel the effects the same as the left arm.

Have you considered conducting some testing when the brainwave synchronizer is in operation? I can see how this could be difficult with your eyes closed, and flashing LEDs in your eyeglass frames. But if you have an assistant, they can help as a guide for experiments to see how the world is perceived when moving about with this brainwave synchronizer in operation. It would be interesting to see if any unusual changes in perception are found under these circumstances.

Best wishes,
J_P