help LRL....???

[ma330]

HI TO ALL:
I WANT A LRL SCHEMATIC THAT NICE WORKING.
LRL MODELS 3 OR 1 ANTENNA.EXAMPLE Electroscope 301 OR Lectra Search X-60 .....
CAN ANY ONE HELP ME????
WAIT FOR YOU DEARS

[Theseus]

HI TO ALL:
I WANT A LRL SCHEMATIC THAT NICE WORKING.
LRL MODELS 3 OR 1 ANTENNA.EXAMPLE Electroscope 301 OR Lectra Search X-60 .....
CAN ANY ONE HELP ME????
WAIT FOR YOU DEARS

http://www.geotech1.com/cgi-bin/pages/common/index.pl?page=lrl&file=reports/escope301/index.dat (http://www.geotech1.com/forums/../cgi-bin/pages/common/index.pl?page=lrl&file=reports/escope301/index.dat)

The link above will take you to a schematic of the Electroscope 301.

However, I don't know exactly what you mean by "nice working". If you mean will it respond to your own ideomotor response, than yes it will do that. But you could save your time and expense of building such a device because the electronics in the 301 do not add anything to the response or the accuracy. You could get the very same results by just working with a bent piece of wire, or a bent piece of brazing rod.

Go to the link below, and you will find some very fine examples of bent wire L-rods that will perform exactly like an Electroscope 301.

http://www.geotech1.com/cgi-bin/pages/common/index.pl?page=lrl&file=/projects/lrl1/index.dat (http://www.geotech1.com/forums/../cgi-bin/pages/common/index.pl?page=lrl&file=/projects/lrl1/index.dat)

Hope this helps.... :)

[Max]

HI TO ALL:
I WANT A LRL SCHEMATIC THAT NICE WORKING.
LRL MODELS 3 OR 1 ANTENNA.EXAMPLE Electroscope 301 OR Lectra Search X-60 .....
CAN ANY ONE HELP ME????
WAIT FOR YOU DEARS

:lol:

It's that "nice working" that makes me laugh...

Do you mean the time when LRL seller get money and customer all happy bring device home maybe ??? :D

Kind regards,
Max

[Qiaozhi]

:lol:

It's that "nice working" that makes me laugh...

Do you mean the time when LRL seller get money and customer all happy bring device home maybe ??? :D

Kind regards,
Max
Very true!

Before you can provide an answer, you need to define what's meant by "nice working". :rolleyes:

[ma330]

http://www.geotech1.com/cgi-bin/pages/common/index.pl?page=lrl&file=reports/escope301/index.dat (http://www.geotech1.com/forums/../cgi-bin/pages/common/index.pl?page=lrl&file=reports/escope301/index.dat)

The link above will take you to a schematic of the Electroscope 301.

However, I don't know exactly what you mean by "nice working". If you mean will it respond to your own ideomotor response, than yes it will do that. But you could save your time and expense of building such a device because the electronics in the 301 do not add anything to the response or the accuracy. You could get the very same results by just working with a bent piece of wire, or a bent piece of brazing rod.

Go to the link below, and you will find some very fine examples of bent wire L-rods that will perform exactly like an Electroscope 301.

http://www.geotech1.com/cgi-bin/pages/common/index.pl?page=lrl&file=/projects/lrl1/index.dat (http://www.geotech1.com/forums/../cgi-bin/pages/common/index.pl?page=lrl&file=/projects/lrl1/index.dat)

Hope this helps.... :)

tank you theseus dear
i see this schematic.but this schematic is very easy.
electroscop have not any IC or TRANSISTOR????
THIS schematic have only resistor and swich.i guessing that bad working.
please very help about this problem.and is possible give me a shchematic than LRL
tank you for help :)

[Fred]

tank you theseus dear
i see this schematic.but this schematic is very easy.
electroscop have not any IC or TRANSISTOR????
THIS schematic have only resistor and swich.i guessing that bad working.
please very help about this problem.and is possible give me a shchematic than LRL
tank you for help :)

Yes, no IC or transistor, but price is very high! so it must work well.:rolleyes:

[ma330]

Yes, no IC or transistor, but price is very high! so it must work well.:rolleyes:
WHAT??????????????????

[putrechigi]

http://www.buscadores-tesoros.com/tecnologia-en-aparatos-de-deteccion-f81/detector-de-largo-rango-t1724.htm

i think this is what you search ,for everybodi too
reguards

[Theseus]

tank you theseus dear
i see this schematic.but this schematic is very easy.
electroscop have not any IC or TRANSISTOR????
THIS schematic have only resistor and swich.i guessing that bad working.
please very help about this problem.and is possible give me a shchematic than LRL
tank you for help :)

The schematic is correct! At least that is what was in "some" of the 301s. Others, that looked just the same on the outside had all kinds of junk and do-nothing parts stuffed in them - to make it look like it was a very complicated device.

Please remember what I told you!!! Nothing inside the box mounted on top of the handle, had anything to do with the response from this LRL. The box and contents were strictly there for added weight - that is all. And of course to fool the gullible and technically-challenged into thinking they got their money's worth.

In truth, THEY GOT RIPPED OFF BIG TIME!

It is a known common fact the Electroscope 301 and all the other look-alike products worked exactly the same whether or not the Power Switch was On or Off.

Asking for a good "working" LRL schematic is akin to asking for the Moon to be delivered to your front door.

There just isn't any such thing. Besides, you can get the exact same results with just bent L-shaped wires so why go to all the trouble of wiring up a do-nothing circuit? :???::???: